From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: "Zachary Amsden" <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@muc.de>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>,
"Chris Wright" <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/11] Panic delay fix
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:58:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d5000702070658l1c018565n34a6d8814a20184d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45C8FA2D.6010706@vmware.com>
On 2/6/07, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:53:30PM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >
> >> Failure to use real-time delay here causes the keyboard to become demonically
> >> possessed in the event of a kernel crash, with wildly blinking lights and
> >> unpredictable behavior. This has resulted in several injuries.
> >>
> >
> > There must be a reason why it wasn't default before. Has this
> > reason changed?
> >
>
> This only matters under paravirt; non-paravirt kernels and kernels
> running on native hardware will always behave properly.
>
> But paravirtualized kernels with fake devices have no need to udelay to
> accommodate slow hardware - the hardware is just virtual. The
> USE_REAL_TIME_DELAY define allows udelay to be specifically reverted
> back to being a real delay. There are only a couple cases where it
> matters - one is booting APs on SMP systems (there is a real delay
> before they come up), and one is any hardware that drives world
> interacting devices - such as keyboard LEDs in a panic loop.
>
I am confused - does i8042 talk to a virtual or real hardware here? In
any case I think you need to fix kernel/panic.c to have proper
(m)delay, not mess with i8042.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 3:53 Zachary Amsden
2007-02-06 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-06 21:59 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-07 12:35 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-07 20:36 ` Rusty Russell
2007-02-07 22:23 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-08 14:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-08 21:26 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-08 21:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-14 12:26 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-14 19:47 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-14 12:52 ` Alan
2007-02-14 20:04 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-14 21:34 ` Alan
2007-02-14 21:53 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-15 0:33 ` Alan
2007-02-15 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-15 23:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-15 23:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-15 23:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-16 3:22 ` Rusty Russell
2007-02-07 14:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2007-02-07 22:31 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-08 8:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-08 9:08 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-02-08 13:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-08 14:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-02-14 12:49 ` Alan
2007-02-14 22:51 ` Rusty Russell
2007-02-15 0:28 ` Alan
2007-02-15 13:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d120d5000702070658l1c018565n34a6d8814a20184d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®