From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965150AbXCAPBK (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:01:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965153AbXCAPBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:01:09 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.242]:8494 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965150AbXCAPBH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:01:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SqBVFeZ63oKVZoAaSXa7mBu22MD3kJ9otDK9EYrbpmXqQYjG+34oohj52oMefvdNClUZ5PbyyEbVJT4uBd2e+jeEq2M8qr8uR8PGLC/o4mgaidFxKDR+Bo0xLEH/mnRqCTaxp1l66Dtvh1hj5ui7htEiQa+5OUVKdvp8szLIbE8= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:01:02 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristian_Gr=F8nfeldt_S=F8rensen?=" Subject: Re: PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resuming from suspend-to-ram Cc: linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux kernel mailing list" In-Reply-To: <1172760952.21416.110.camel@miraculinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1172601905.5428.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1172622441.4587.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200702281345.15098.rjw@sisk.pl> <200703010036.28166.dtor@insightbb.com> <1172760952.21416.110.camel@miraculinux> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/1/07, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Please try the patch below. > > Hmmm. Is the diff against 2.6.20? All hunks except one fails when i try > it. If I pass "-F 3" to patch, then one more hunk succeeds. Am I doing > something wrong? > Hm, technically speaking it is against 2.6.21-rc2 but I think exceppt for tsdev part it should apply to 2.6.20... -- Dmitry