From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965585AbXCGQ4c (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:56:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965583AbXCGQ4c (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:56:32 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:60334 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965585AbXCGQ4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:56:30 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dWtQ6LH4Y9AQrA9EKpvRifEXVKx02sANJEek6XF9zcqnsp8t7O1gJfy873SDaVb9yNsPQecaEsDANSdNyTAbyYUlz4C92NKMZQ788n3LbpOkcz5m9mFrJrLTePRHZ2W0QZXP1Sp/3H9RJdN083jOSQFEwxasAUyJqeZRbwXx5/8= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:56:27 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "Jiri Slaby" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: add sensable phantom driver Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Greg KH" In-Reply-To: <45EEEAA3.50009@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2460126662758025813@fi.muni.cz> <45EEEAA3.50009@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a): > > Hi Jiri, > > Hi. > > > On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> add sensable phantom driver > > ... > > > > General question - can this driver use force-feedback mecahnisms > > already present in kernel instead of exporting raw datastream to > > userspace. What are shortcomings of kernels force-feedback > > implemenattion that make it insufficient for phantom? > > I didn't even think about it, sorry. Does any problem with rate about 2kHz come > on your mind before I'll try to rewrite it? No, not really. -- Dmitry