From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752880AbXDKOhn (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:37:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752844AbXDKOhR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:37:17 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232]:62506 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752869AbXDKOhN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:37:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r1cWsOBmWsUC5I6ms078/q98xLHvUPXNgtDaP204NCvrQAmdPnUv0StniPbCZ+dgardSWd7Ep/7J5tsUypSsI5uBTiBNG3GX8oPVQbseCaeHibiOqazYDcbrpmat4H3KZ84tq+uoYoFCeGclCtIVY5cIxqVpTvCuDicnCMR5VO4= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:37:11 -0400 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "Helge Hafting" Subject: Re: usb touchscreen breakage in 2.6.21-rc5-mm4 ? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <461CAF73.3020201@aitel.hist.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070407005458.GA18985@aitel.hist.no> <200704062237.13118.dtor@insightbb.com> <20070409223643.GB2198@aitel.hist.no> <200704092230.04144.dtor@insightbb.com> <461B9DFF.9080704@aitel.hist.no> <461CAF73.3020201@aitel.hist.no> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/11/07, Helge Hafting wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > *sigh* When will I learn to spell names of kernel parameters > > correctly? It is initcall_debug, not debug_initcall :( Could you try > > again, please? > Here is the dmesg for rc5mm4 with initcall_debug, showing how > no usbtouch function is called at all. > Helge, I don't have any explanation why we don't see usbtouch_init called at all in -rc5-mm4. Could it be toolchain misbehaving? Do you see references to usbtouch_init in the kernel image itself? -- Dmitry