From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756571AbXEQOPu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752658AbXEQOPo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:44 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:27170 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330AbXEQOPn (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QisSiqfgZRunEJs3uOeQ+pbr30Phzqvbg/I5y4tCBNK/+/WuFP35y2wKpQJvSe6VLzo1c/rC0XSyc0A7qlq+3DddUcfW/VpJuAq2e3uZ03o0nAPGGuKYCE3CDxLYyprc5ghjHk4KNtN6ecyjRIb08JI43LddrEbm2Z+tCOCrJ3w= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:15:37 -0400 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "Thomas Gleixner" Subject: Re: [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr Cc: LKML , "Stable Team" , "Greg KH" , "Andrew Morton" , "Andi Kleen" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Ralf Baechle" , "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" , "Richard Henderson" In-Reply-To: <1179408962.3764.72.camel@chaos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1179408962.3764.72.camel@chaos> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, > +#include I don't see this file in include/asm-i386 and your patch only creates asm-x86_64... BTW, is there any reason 8253pit.h can't be used...? Hmm... The best way IMO woudl be if arch code attached spinlock that should be used by pcspkr driver to pcspkr platform device (as platform_data) and we would not have private lock at all. BTW, with all that usevent_supress busiess, does pcspkr gets loaded automatically nowadays? -- Dmitry