From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754804AbYIESda (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:33:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751972AbYIESdW (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:33:22 -0400 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:49959 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbYIESdU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:33:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=W7IqISSvtrfEldSOQaa0p6jJAuLWN1mK7L3qlQTznQ4tB1D4OgPO9aKcB7qGQWlQ7C eH4SpVarBDOYrUFeJ9eXKzGkW7i34R4lehHM4/pSzDwkxw2rBtGf8iLzLtjbdAW3eTYM cQlnvOYEbOoT3Ixi0e9ypFqP2qgRbr78lJnaM= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:33:18 -0400 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" To: "Takashi Iwai" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucb1400_ts depends SND_AC97_BUS Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" , "Randy Dunlap" , lkml , akpm , linux-next@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061209003635.e778ff76.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080904195744.f367cd2d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080904214444.0dccf859.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:32:32 -0400 (EDT), > Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> >> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >> > At Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:52:25 -0400 (EDT), >> > Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > > >> > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> > > >> > > > > This was fixed 2 years ago. Who broke it this time? >> > > > >> > > > Oh, it must be me. >> > > >> > > I think both your patch and the one I previously posted are needed. >> > >> > Could you repost? I can't find it easily now. > > Thanks. For linux-next, yes, it's needed. But it's not for 2.6.27. > > Meanwhile, my fix should be included in 2.6.27 since it's a > regression. > > Randy, could you check whether these two patches fix your problem? > I'll put my patch to my tree for the next pull request after your > confirmation. > > Can Nicolas's patch be to input tree, or any other taker? > I'll take it. -- Dmitry