From: Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <lfpg.dev@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Flooded by do_IRQ: 0.91 No irq handler for vector
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:30:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d12c1890909161730y663fe4f3s5b7e764a53d971ba@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908201031.00256.lfpg.dev@gmail.com>
Just to point out that I've upgraded to 2.6.31.0 and the bug is still there...
Just in case the problem is with the VIA board, is there anything
which can be done to try to debug?
--
Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
>> > Well, as I've installed sidux, it has upgraded the kernel to 2.6.30.5,
>> > but the error is the same.
>> > I've also tried:
>> > * noapic: the message changes to do_IRQ: 0.55 No irq handler for
>> > vector (irq -1), but then the X server fails to start
>>
>> Interesting...
>>
>> > * noacpi: have no effect on the error message.
>>
>> There is something very strange about your box. Possibly it is
>> just VIA interrupt controller madness. VIA has been known
>> to interrupt interrupt related fields in creative ways, and
>> we may be on the edge of another of these.
> Probably. My mother board is an Asus P5VD2-X, which is based on VIA PT890:
> http://br.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3&l2=11&l3=346&l4=0&model=1362&modelmenu=1 (sorry, link in portuguese)
>
>>
>> I expect it is going to come down to writing a patch to dump out
>> all of the interrupt routing state on the system and to see what
>> is generating the totally unexpected interrupt and then to work our
>> way backwards from there.
>>
>> The fact that the vector number is changing indicates that it is
>> a programmable something that is causing the problem.
>>
>> I'm drawing a blank on which patch to write up.
>>
>> Eric
>>
> Thanks again.
>
> --
> Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 23:30 Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
2009-08-10 23:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-08-11 1:01 ` Robert Hancock
2009-08-11 1:25 ` Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
2009-08-11 22:28 ` Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
2009-08-12 23:59 ` Robert Hancock
2009-08-19 18:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-19 21:46 ` Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
2009-08-20 2:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-20 13:31 ` Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
2009-09-17 0:30 ` Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez [this message]
2009-08-31 15:58 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d12c1890909161730y663fe4f3s5b7e764a53d971ba@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lfpg.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®