From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 543EE35A2AC; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755529137; cv=none; b=YnysyVkKD/XDKK4IG04wKGFZ1GoPLT3kxIvc+F7SmfokQmnwrIO+oNYjmiDw2XGnfZ3jiAPXgbAmlHYotUopms+w0zTa/p6W5FAZG5VHSpHQCx7QZWVHtIdkepEs+u3bDgK8ywiRbRMaX5oIPzGfTG4ymPmU5nyoXZFxBdsQmms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755529137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sj/oXfDVVXELOAADYk1HnGfq6Lc0xGCmRN8XpZzZMCc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=P0JQ4E7qMRPO4ujumqn9Ahy7jmvb2Lwxx5Trle+VcLfWTcl90OI1Fmd2yY/8c2alkfboeAH0DjrwOO5/vsJgByFOVlhZmz8sLhRNUf8QFc2m16o4DDcDDGb16bYzaZ655437cEHlTk2LAZSXMNJCJylfUdcX2gBxWCaUJx9KLIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=ZohjIzNQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="ZohjIzNQ" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c5G7b537qz9t7s; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:58:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1755529131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=It6WsGpfjWI4leoXs05vkzx9/2tYzuPt+sPubFhfa+0=; b=ZohjIzNQt2wCVmQYGFKOP73CFbd6Ia0/eaGon8+3QyJWF1qEjO3Ww3UY5k/frrG/RiYlHC Gr/S+lyczLT2Knd0qczhXn2tzrfObKvXItL8eQzz7O9RPyaQPSIUX7KqRjmRAiS8+ojZVD ZoWeeH3G1LHZgkLl4EMyUwrAnIXGI7B7xOJovQFn/i87Jqfbt2iUsSGfvI3M/CKVSe7Xbn TntQ2bHdqBtkddu2hZyQh9+9v0E5mC2zqzqyc1zXrro52VjACsNYWZdaQ6tlahOzvvTLJQ dJsvfcKTHPaAo5ex3L0T6ZMJjiunz6u30bzxbdbIfeZeyGk72zL0/3jinC4YeA== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:58:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: stm32: Drop redundant status=okay To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Christoph Niedermaier , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@dh-electronics.com References: <20250818143730.244379-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <388e6f81-383b-4b39-9b75-8d2cdbf95d37@mailbox.org> <259e72c0-b69a-42d4-aec5-ad8a6e03d416@kernel.org> <651df530-797a-45e1-b199-917deda33222@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <651df530-797a-45e1-b199-917deda33222@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-META: 6nsdwhcsnfm3nimas3f6jx49wjpdyxzm X-MBO-RS-ID: e1973190b65b1be2432 On 8/18/25 4:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/08/2025 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 18/08/2025 16:45, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 8/18/25 4:37 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Device nodes are enabled by default, so remove confusing or duplicated >>>> enabling of few nodes. No practical impact, verified with dtx_diff. >>> I assume the "no practical impact" means DTs are identical before/after >>> this patch ? If yes, >> >> >> No, DTS cannot be identical in this case because one had status, new one >> does not have. Practical impact means... visible impact in practice. How >> to say it more clearly? > To illustrate: this is "no practical impact": > > > --- dts-old/st/stm32mp157c-dhcom-picoitx.dtb > +++ dts-new/st/stm32mp157c-dhcom-picoitx.dtb > @@ -691,14 +691,12 @@ > interrupt-controller; > interrupts-extended = <0x49 0x00 > reg = <0x33>; > - status = "okay"; Sorry, yes, this ^ is what I meant and obviously wrote too fast and too inaccurately. My RB still stands. Thanks