From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable kprobe to monitor sdei event handler
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:20:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d197785a-9e3b-2c88-d882-b59075a38264@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555070699-3685-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Hi Xiongfeng Wang,
On 12/04/2019 13:04, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> When I use kprobe to monitor a sdei event handler,
Don't do this! SDEI is like an NMI, it isn't safe to kprobe it as it can interrupt the
kprobe code, causing it become re-entrant.
> the CPU will hang. It's
> because when I probe the event handler, the instruction will be replaced with
> brk instruction and brk exception is unmaskable. But 'vbar_el1' contains
> 'tramp_vectors' in '_sdei_handler' when SDEI events interrupt userspace, so
> we will go to the wrong place if brk exception happens.
This was lucky! Its even more fun if the SDEI event interrupted a guest: the kvm vectors
will give you a hyp-panic.
The __kprobes and NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() litter should stop you doing this.
> I notice that 'ghes_sdei_normal_callback' call several funtions that are not
> marked as 'nokprobe'.
Bother. We should probably blacklist those too, its not safe.
> So I was wondering if we can enable kprobe in '_sdei_handler'.
I don't think this can be done safely.
If you need to monitor your SDEI event handler you can just use printk(). Once nmi_enter()
has been called these are safe as they stash data in a per-cpu buffer. The SDEI handler
will exit via the IRQ vector if it can, which will cause this buffer to be flushed to the
console in a timely manner.
Why do you need to kprobe an NMI handler?
Thanks!
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 12:04 Xiongfeng Wang
2019-04-12 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Revert "arm64: debug: remove unused local_dbg_{enable, disable} macros" Xiongfeng Wang
2019-04-12 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sdei: enable dbg in '_sdei_handler' Xiongfeng Wang
2019-04-24 16:21 ` James Morse
2019-04-12 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: mask sdei before running the callback Xiongfeng Wang
2019-04-24 16:20 ` James Morse [this message]
2019-04-26 8:19 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable kprobe to monitor sdei event handler Xiongfeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d197785a-9e3b-2c88-d882-b59075a38264@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®