On Tue, 13 Oct 2026, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 13-Oct-26 10:34, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2026, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> >> On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 03:37:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>>> Commits
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   4dabecbb202e8 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: add Omen Transcend 14 8C58 support")
> >>>>>   9af7fddef448d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: suppress -ENODEV warning in fan_curve_get_factory_default()")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors
> >>>>
> >>>> This issue is still present today.
> >>>
> >>> And today.
> >>
> >> And today - should Ilpo be added to the list of contacts for this tree?
> > 
> > Yeah, I'm in practice the person who is handling pdx86 patches these days 
> > so it would be good.
> > 
> > ...Goes to do some massive history rewriting...
> 
> My bad, I missed you (Ilpo) were not getting these emails, sorry.

I finally went and improved my patch getting script to block any 
submissions for which git interpret-trailers shows no Sign-off-by lines.
That'll make it in practice impossible for me to apply such submissions 
anymore.

It's not entirely foolproof though as the Signed-off-by could still be 
invalid one e.g. by being different from From and I don't know easy way to 
extract From from a patch file (consider encodings and multiple From 
lines properly).

-- 
 i.