mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: Explicitly set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN = 8
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:30:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d20680b3-f71e-9eb7-f79c-660e25673d82@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4881796E12491D4BB15146FE0209CE64681EECE5@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>

On 2/18/19 12:53 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> So are you OK with this patch or something should be done before applying?

Or your original patch was

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LL64
+#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN     8
+#endif

I don't think this issue is related to LL64 at all. A long long on ARC could be 4
byte aligned (as mandated by the ABI). It could use LDD or 2 separate LDs. This
has no bearing on the fact that LLOCKD have to use a 64-bit aligned addresses. So
I think we should just do this unconditionally. Agree ?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-19 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-08 10:55 Alexey Brodkin
2019-02-12 17:17 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-02-12 17:30   ` David Laight
2019-02-12 17:45     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-02-13 12:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-13 14:13         ` David Laight
2019-02-13 23:23         ` Vineet Gupta
2019-02-14  8:50           ` Alexey Brodkin
2019-02-14 10:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-15  1:34             ` Vineet Gupta
2019-02-18  8:53               ` Alexey Brodkin
2019-02-19 23:30                 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2019-02-14 10:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-14 10:44             ` Alexey Brodkin
2019-02-14 11:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-14 12:05                 ` Alexey Brodkin
2019-02-14 12:24                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-14 14:14                 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d20680b3-f71e-9eb7-f79c-660e25673d82@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®