From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize EAS energy calculation complexity from O(N) to O(1) inside inner loop
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:08:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d230cb20-906d-44e7-87b7-9ec2e7c5a543@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122154227.130767-1-realwujing@gmail.com>
On 1/22/26 15:42, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> By pre-calculating the base max utilization of each performance domain
> at the start of find_energy_efficient_cpu(), we can avoid the repetitive
> O(M) scan in eenv_pd_max_util() for every candidate CPU.
>
> This reduces the complexity of energy calculation from O(P*N) to O(N + P^2),
> where P is the number of performance domains. For systems with many
> performance domains or high core counts, this results in significant
> reduction in wakeup latency.
I don't think these are correct, but also
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 458324d240e9..de5bfdfe553f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8236,41 +8236,32 @@ static inline void eenv_pd_busy_time(struct energy_env *eenv,
> * exceed @eenv->cpu_cap.
> */
> static inline unsigned long
> -eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
> +eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct perf_domain *pd,
> struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
> {
> - unsigned long max_util = 0;
> - int cpu;
> + unsigned long max_util = pd->max_util;
>
> - for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
> - struct task_struct *tsk = (cpu == dst_cpu) ? p : NULL;
> - unsigned long util = cpu_util(cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
> + if (dst_cpu >= 0 && cpumask_test_cpu(dst_cpu, perf_domain_span(pd))) {
> + unsigned long util = cpu_util(dst_cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
> unsigned long eff_util, min, max;
>
> - /*
> - * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
> - * must be considered since it affects the selection
> - * of the performance domain frequency.
> - * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the min
> - * utilization can be max OPP.
> - */
> - eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, &min, &max);
> + eff_util = effective_cpu_util(dst_cpu, util, &min, &max);
>
> /* Task's uclamp can modify min and max value */
> - if (tsk && uclamp_is_used()) {
> + if (uclamp_is_used()) {
> min = max(min, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
>
> /*
> * If there is no active max uclamp constraint,
> * directly use task's one, otherwise keep max.
> */
> - if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu)))
> + if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(dst_cpu)))
> max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
> else
> max = max(max, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
> }
>
> - eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(cpu, eff_util, min, max);
> + eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(dst_cpu, eff_util, min, max);
> max_util = max(max_util, eff_util);
> }
>
> @@ -8286,7 +8277,7 @@ static inline unsigned long
> compute_energy(struct energy_env *eenv, struct perf_domain *pd,
> struct cpumask *pd_cpus, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
> {
> - unsigned long max_util = eenv_pd_max_util(eenv, pd_cpus, p, dst_cpu);
> + unsigned long max_util = eenv_pd_max_util(eenv, pd, p, dst_cpu);
> unsigned long busy_time = eenv->pd_busy_time;
> unsigned long energy;
>
> @@ -8351,7 +8342,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> unsigned long best_actual_cap = 0;
> unsigned long prev_actual_cap = 0;
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> - struct perf_domain *pd;
> + struct perf_domain *pd, *tmp_pd;
> struct energy_env eenv;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -8377,6 +8368,23 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>
> eenv_task_busy_time(&eenv, p, prev_cpu);
>
> + /* Algorithmic Optimization: Pre-calculate max_util for O(1) energy estimation */
> + for (tmp_pd = pd; tmp_pd; tmp_pd = tmp_pd->next) {
> + unsigned long max_u = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i, perf_domain_span(tmp_pd)) {
> + unsigned long util = cpu_util(i, p, -1, 1);
> + unsigned long eff_util, min, max;
> +
> + eff_util = effective_cpu_util(i, util, &min, &max);
> + eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(i, eff_util, min, max);
> + if (eff_util > max_u)
> + max_u = eff_util;
> + }
> + tmp_pd->max_util = max_u;
You can't do this as there's no synchronisation for perf_domain apart from
the rcu_read_lock() here.
> + }
> +
> for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
> unsigned long util_min = p_util_min, util_max = p_util_max;
> unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_actual_cap, util;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index d30cca6870f5..f308d335ca77 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -972,6 +972,10 @@ struct perf_domain {
> struct em_perf_domain *em_pd;
> struct perf_domain *next;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> +
> + /* O(1) optimization hints */
> + unsigned long max_util;
> + int max_spare_cap_cpu;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 5a3f29a26bdb..b9de022ddb53 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static struct perf_domain *pd_init(int cpu)
> if (!pd)
> return NULL;
> pd->em_pd = obj;
> + pd->max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
>
> return pd;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 15:42 Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-22 16:08 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-01-23 9:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-22 20:58 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2026-01-22 22:54 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-22 23:35 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-23 11:51 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d230cb20-906d-44e7-87b7-9ec2e7c5a543@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=realwujing@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®