mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize EAS energy calculation complexity from O(N) to O(1) inside inner loop
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:08:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d230cb20-906d-44e7-87b7-9ec2e7c5a543@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122154227.130767-1-realwujing@gmail.com>

On 1/22/26 15:42, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> By pre-calculating the base max utilization of each performance domain
> at the start of find_energy_efficient_cpu(), we can avoid the repetitive
> O(M) scan in eenv_pd_max_util() for every candidate CPU.
> 
> This reduces the complexity of energy calculation from O(P*N) to O(N + P^2),
> where P is the number of performance domains. For systems with many
> performance domains or high core counts, this results in significant
> reduction in wakeup latency.

I don't think these are correct, but also

> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c     | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  4 ++++
>  kernel/sched/topology.c |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 458324d240e9..de5bfdfe553f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8236,41 +8236,32 @@ static inline void eenv_pd_busy_time(struct energy_env *eenv,
>   * exceed @eenv->cpu_cap.
>   */
>  static inline unsigned long
> -eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
> +eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct perf_domain *pd,
>  		 struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long max_util = 0;
> -	int cpu;
> +	unsigned long max_util = pd->max_util;
>  
> -	for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
> -		struct task_struct *tsk = (cpu == dst_cpu) ? p : NULL;
> -		unsigned long util = cpu_util(cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
> +	if (dst_cpu >= 0 && cpumask_test_cpu(dst_cpu, perf_domain_span(pd))) {
> +		unsigned long util = cpu_util(dst_cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
>  		unsigned long eff_util, min, max;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
> -		 * must be considered since it affects the selection
> -		 * of the performance domain frequency.
> -		 * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the min
> -		 * utilization can be max OPP.
> -		 */
> -		eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, &min, &max);
> +		eff_util = effective_cpu_util(dst_cpu, util, &min, &max);
>  
>  		/* Task's uclamp can modify min and max value */
> -		if (tsk && uclamp_is_used()) {
> +		if (uclamp_is_used()) {
>  			min = max(min, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * If there is no active max uclamp constraint,
>  			 * directly use task's one, otherwise keep max.
>  			 */
> -			if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu)))
> +			if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(dst_cpu)))
>  				max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
>  			else
>  				max = max(max, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
>  		}
>  
> -		eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(cpu, eff_util, min, max);
> +		eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(dst_cpu, eff_util, min, max);
>  		max_util = max(max_util, eff_util);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -8286,7 +8277,7 @@ static inline unsigned long
>  compute_energy(struct energy_env *eenv, struct perf_domain *pd,
>  	       struct cpumask *pd_cpus, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long max_util = eenv_pd_max_util(eenv, pd_cpus, p, dst_cpu);
> +	unsigned long max_util = eenv_pd_max_util(eenv, pd, p, dst_cpu);
>  	unsigned long busy_time = eenv->pd_busy_time;
>  	unsigned long energy;
>  
> @@ -8351,7 +8342,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>  	unsigned long best_actual_cap = 0;
>  	unsigned long prev_actual_cap = 0;
>  	struct sched_domain *sd;
> -	struct perf_domain *pd;
> +	struct perf_domain *pd, *tmp_pd;
>  	struct energy_env eenv;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -8377,6 +8368,23 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>  
>  	eenv_task_busy_time(&eenv, p, prev_cpu);
>  
> +	/* Algorithmic Optimization: Pre-calculate max_util for O(1) energy estimation */
> +	for (tmp_pd = pd; tmp_pd; tmp_pd = tmp_pd->next) {
> +		unsigned long max_u = 0;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		for_each_cpu(i, perf_domain_span(tmp_pd)) {
> +			unsigned long util = cpu_util(i, p, -1, 1);
> +			unsigned long eff_util, min, max;
> +
> +			eff_util = effective_cpu_util(i, util, &min, &max);
> +			eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(i, eff_util, min, max);
> +			if (eff_util > max_u)
> +				max_u = eff_util;
> +		}
> +		tmp_pd->max_util = max_u;

You can't do this as there's no synchronisation for perf_domain apart from
the rcu_read_lock() here.

> +	}
> +
>  	for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
>  		unsigned long util_min = p_util_min, util_max = p_util_max;
>  		unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_actual_cap, util;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index d30cca6870f5..f308d335ca77 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -972,6 +972,10 @@ struct perf_domain {
>  	struct em_perf_domain *em_pd;
>  	struct perf_domain *next;
>  	struct rcu_head rcu;
> +
> +	/* O(1) optimization hints */
> +	unsigned long	   max_util;
> +	int		   max_spare_cap_cpu;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 5a3f29a26bdb..b9de022ddb53 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static struct perf_domain *pd_init(int cpu)
>  	if (!pd)
>  		return NULL;
>  	pd->em_pd = obj;
> +	pd->max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
>  
>  	return pd;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-22 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-22 15:42 Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-22 16:08 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-01-23  9:14   ` [PATCH v2] " Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-22 20:58 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2026-01-22 22:54 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-22 23:35 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-23 11:51 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d230cb20-906d-44e7-87b7-9ec2e7c5a543@arm.com \
    --to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=realwujing@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®