From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751950AbdJZWzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:55:48 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:42371 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457AbdJZWzp (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:55:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.1~B To: Stefano Stabellini , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior References: <20171005125655.12373-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:56:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/05/2017 03:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h >> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build. >> >> Cc: Stefano Stabellini >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini Applied to for-linus-4.14c. -boris