mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	rui.zhang@intel.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
	gautham.shenoy@amd.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	ravi.bangoria@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:40:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2573f67-ae0d-4f50-a035-a05aa89b8122@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3956760b-de6e-4726-ac4f-e03738233f73@linux.intel.com>

Hello Kan,

On 8/2/2024 8:56 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
> Hi Dhananjay,
> 
> On 2024-07-30 12:49 a.m., Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
>> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
>> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
>> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
>> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
>> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
>>
>> For more historical context, please refer to commit 32fb480e0a2c
>> ("powercap/intel_rapl: Support multi-die/package"), which initially changed
>> the RAPL scope from package to die for all systems, as Intel systems
>> with Die enumeration have RAPL scope as die, and those without die
>> enumeration were not affected by it. So, all systems(Intel, AMD, Hygon),
>> worked correctly with topology_logical_die_id() until recently, but this
>> changed after the "0x80000026 leaf" commit mentioned above.
>>
>> Replacing topology_logical_die_id() with topology_physical_package_id()
>> conditionally only for AMD and Hygon fixes the energy-pkg event.
>>
>> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
>>
>> Before:
>> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
>> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
>>
>> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
>> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
>> the package.
>>
>> After:
>> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
>> 0
>>
>> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> * Updated the scope description comment
>> * Dont create rapl_pmu_cpumask and rapl_pmu_idx local variables, as they're
>>   used only once, instead call the get_* functions directly where needed
>> * Check topology_logical_(die/package)_id return value
>> --->  arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> I just posted a patch set to clean up the hotplug code in perf.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240802151643.1691631-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
> 
> With the cleanup patch set, the fix may be simplified as below.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index b70ad880c5bc..801697be4118 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,10 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
>  	rapl_pmus->pmu.module           = THIS_MODULE;
>  	rapl_pmus->pmu.scope            = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_DIE;
>  	rapl_pmus->pmu.capabilities     = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE;
> +
> +	if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
> +		rapl_pmus->pmu.scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_PKG;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> Could you please take a look at the cleanup patch and give it a try?

Sorry for the late reply, I was out sick for last few days.

I tried out my fix(modified) on top your patchset, the energy-pkg event seems to be
working correctly,

On a Zen4 Genoa EPYC server:

When idle,

~$ sudo perf stat -a -e power/energy-pkg/ sleep 1

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

             33.93 Joules power/energy-pkg/

       1.001969742 seconds time elapsed

After running stress-ng:

~$ sudo perf stat -a -e power/energy-pkg/ sleep 1

 Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

            376.16 Joules power/energy-pkg/

       1.003985155 seconds time elapsed

Please feel free to add my tested-by on your hotplug cleanup patchset.

Thanks,
Dhananjay

> 
> Thanks,
> Kan
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> index b985ca79cf97..7097c0f6a71f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,19 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = {				\
>>  	.event_str	= str,							\
>>  };
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * RAPL Package energy counter scope:
>> + * 1. AMD/HYGON platforms have a per-PKG package energy counter
>> + * 2. For Intel platforms
>> + *	2.1. CLX-AP is multi-die and its RAPL MSRs are die-scope
>> + *	2.2. Other Intel platforms are single die systems so the scope can be
>> + *	     considered as either pkg-scope or die-scope, and we are considering
>> + *	     them as die-scope.
>> + */
>> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope()				\
>> +	(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||	\
>> +	 boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
>> +
>>  struct rapl_pmu {
>>  	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
>>  	int			n_active;
>> @@ -140,9 +153,25 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
>>  static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
>>  static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Helper functions to get the correct topology macros according to the
>> + * RAPL PMU scope.
>> + */
>> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
>> +					 topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline const struct cpumask *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
>> +					 topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
>>  {
>> -	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
>> +	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
>> @@ -552,7 +581,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>>  
>>  	pmu->cpu = -1;
>>  	/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
>> -	target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
>> +	target = cpumask_any_but(get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
>>  
>>  	/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
>>  	if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
>> @@ -565,6 +594,11 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>>  
>>  static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>>  {
>> +	s32 rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
>> +	if (rapl_pmu_idx < 0) {
>> +		pr_err("topology_logical_(package/die)_id() returned a negative value");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>>  	struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
>>  	int target;
>>  
>> @@ -579,14 +613,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>>  		pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
>>  		rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
>>  
>> -		rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
>> +		rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
>>  	 * events already.
>>  	 */
>> -	target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
>> +	target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu));
>>  	if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>> @@ -675,7 +709,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_update[] = {
>>  
>>  static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
>>  {
>> -	int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();
>> +	int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
>> +
>> +	if (!rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
>> +		nr_rapl_pmu *= topology_max_dies_per_package();
>>  
>>  	rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!rapl_pmus)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-08 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-30  4:49 [PATCH v2 0/2] RAPL driver fixes " Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-30  4:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event " Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-08-02 15:26   ` Liang, Kan
2024-08-08 12:10     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2024-07-30  4:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/intel_rapl: " Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-08-02 12:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-08 11:17     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-08-19 13:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-21  4:57         ` Gautham R. Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d2573f67-ae0d-4f50-a035-a05aa89b8122@amd.com \
    --to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®