mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "dsahern@kernel.org" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>, "ja@ssi.bg" <ja@ssi.bg>,
	Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>, "fw@strlen.de" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"kuniyu@google.com" <kuniyu@google.com>,
	"bridge@lists.linux.dev" <bridge@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bridge: Validate and clean up IPv6 neighbour suppression
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:20:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d27e9e6d-351f-45e6-914b-3189fb6d3fd7@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ2PR12MB9008CFB1549DE9F3B7AC23F0D8C02@SJ2PR12MB9008.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On 23/07/2026 09:40, Danielle Ratson wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
>> Sent: Monday, 20 July 2026 12:31
>> To: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: dsahern@kernel.org; Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>;
>> davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
>> pabeni@redhat.com; horms@kernel.org; ja@ssi.bg; Petr Machata
>> <petrm@nvidia.com>; fw@strlen.de; kuniyu@google.com;
>> bridge@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bridge: Validate and clean up IPv6
>> neighbour suppression
>>
>> On 19/07/2026 16:34, Danielle Ratson wrote:
>>> The bridge implements IPv6 neighbour suppression by snooping Neighbour
>>> Solicitation and Neighbour Advertisement messages, but it previously
>>> only checked the ICMPv6 type and code before acting on them. This
>>> leaves it open to acting on malformed or spoofed packets that any RFC
>>> 4861 compliant node should reject, and the option parsing in
>>> br_nd_send() open-codes a loop that has historically been a source of bugs.
>>>
>>> This series hardens and cleans up that path:
>>>
>>> Add ndisc_check_ns_na(), a standalone NS/NA validator modeled after
>>> ipv6_mc_check_mld(), implementing the RFC 4861 section 7.1.1 / 7.1.2
>>> mandatory receive checks (hop limit, checksum, code, length, target
>>> and option validation). Wire the bridge into it so NS/NA messages are
>>> validated to the same standard MLD already enjoys.
>>>
>>> Replace the manual ND option parsing loop in br_nd_send() with
>>> ndisc_parse_options() and ndisc_opt_addr_data(), and linearize the skb
>>> once it has been validated as an NS/NA message so that this and any
>>> future ND message handling operate on a linear buffer. The first patch
>>> is a small preparatory cleanup that drops the now-unnecessary
>>> skb_header_pointer() fallback from br_is_nd_neigh_msg().
>>>
>>> No functional change is intended for well-formed packets.
>>>
>>> Patchset overview:
>>> Patch #1: drop the skb_header_pointer() fallback.
>>> Patches #2-#3: add ndisc_check_ns_na() and validate NS/NA with it.
>>> Patch #4: linearize once the ND message type is validated.
>>> Patch #5: parse options via ndisc_parse_options().
>>>
>>> Danielle Ratson (5):
>>>     bridge: Use direct pointer in br_is_nd_neigh_msg()
>>>     ipv6: ndisc: Add ndisc_check_ns_na() validation helper
>>>     bridge: Validate NS/NA messages using ndisc_check_ns_na()
>>>     bridge: Linearize skb once the ND message type is validated
>>>     bridge: Use ndisc_parse_options() to parse ND options in
>>> br_nd_send()
>>>
>>>    include/net/ndisc.h          |   2 +
>>>    net/bridge/br_arp_nd_proxy.c |  54 +++++-----
>>>    net/bridge/br_device.c       |   4 +-
>>>    net/bridge/br_input.c        |   4 +-
>>>    net/bridge/br_private.h      |   2 +-
>>>    net/ipv6/Makefile            |   2 +-
>>>    net/ipv6/ndisc.c             |   1 +
>>>    net/ipv6/ndisc_snoop.c       | 190
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    8 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 net/ipv6/ndisc_snoop.c
>>>
>>
>> Nice set, but I'm curious - any reason not to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
>> instead?
>>
> 
> I guess you are referring to ndisc_parse_options and ndisc_check_ns_na?
> The reason is basically that other sibling functions used EXPORT_SYMBOL() rather than EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() (ndisc_send_skb, ndisc_ns_create, and the ndisc_check_ns_na() equivalent in mld, ipv6_mc_check_mld()).
> However, ndisc_send_na() for example is newer and uses EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So it might make sense to use that in ndisc_parse_options(), if you prefer.
> 

Yep, I was referring to those newly exported symbols.
Personally I'd always go for the _GPL variant when possible, but it's not a
strong preference, more a personal one. I was just curious if there was some
particular reason not to be. :)

Thanks,
  Nik

>> Cheers,
>>    Nik


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-19 13:34 Danielle Ratson
2026-07-19 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] bridge: Use direct pointer in br_is_nd_neigh_msg() Danielle Ratson
2026-07-20  8:58   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-19 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] ipv6: ndisc: Add ndisc_check_ns_na() validation helper Danielle Ratson
2026-07-20  9:13   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-19 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] bridge: Validate NS/NA messages using ndisc_check_ns_na() Danielle Ratson
2026-07-20  9:14   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-19 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] bridge: Linearize skb once the ND message type is validated Danielle Ratson
2026-07-20  9:26   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-26 11:03     ` Danielle Ratson
2026-07-27  9:17       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-19 13:34 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] bridge: Use ndisc_parse_options() to parse ND options in br_nd_send() Danielle Ratson
2026-07-20  9:27   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-20  9:31 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] bridge: Validate and clean up IPv6 neighbour suppression Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-07-23  6:40   ` Danielle Ratson
2026-07-23  9:20     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2026-07-23  9:49       ` Petr Machata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d27e9e6d-351f-45e6-914b-3189fb6d3fd7@blackwall.org \
    --to=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®