From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751424Ab1GWFrI (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:47:08 -0400 Received: from webmail1.b-one.net ([195.47.247.29]:27674 "EHLO webmail1.one.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750927Ab1GWFq7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:46:59 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110722160832.ee535e0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20110722160832.ee535e0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:46:58 +0200 Subject: Re: Possible bug in inotify api From: Morten Winkler =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgensen?= To: "Andrew Morton" Cc: morten@winkler.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric Paris" Reply-To: morten@winkler.dk User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew. >> Attached: C++ program used to reproduce the behavior. > > I ran it a couple of times on my 2.6.32-based 2-CPU desktop here and it > ran to completion without any complaints. > > So perhaps we fixed whatever-it-was in a later kernel. 2.6.23 is > pretty old! I see. Thank you for trying out. Once our situation allows for a kernel update I'll do so. In the meanwhile, I'll have to think of something else. Also, I'll try on other machines with newer kernels. Again, thank you for your effort Best, Morten