From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7175C5B57A for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE22075B for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Xf/owdAu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726916AbfF2Q0z (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:26:55 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:38778 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726837AbfF2Q0z (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:26:55 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id j6so19198993ioa.5 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:26:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G4jzVLONMzA8LW+cz32727nywRT+O/K9mkpd2LMUTPo=; b=Xf/owdAundwCMeibMCAixAOmLvLrzLUlMemlcf+2ni29EvOJIIssxdSE7aBhHnwnQJ JQGeWHaeMB+KC0p3WFTZ5Eq6NummvATg9V/AvGWTDBlXtKP7iciCOt5QqYyAX2DBSams fEjizaGD1KtppcisjfhvlcIi/MZvZs3F5v8cliaShqJeK3mbuPnUqV9TjH9rRTHVYkf3 Fh4w9BU9hZxsnkLEW0gltClsnYIjQQ52YHmRYI+tWU+tobCoZLW2OI6uLwDg/ZUCEHLj Gqqbif+WYhlEDSn/VrfsiR5YM5/ydFfoyt3f2DwTe3grZ9CSII8E4b7mUBjWF77jV5q3 pHjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G4jzVLONMzA8LW+cz32727nywRT+O/K9mkpd2LMUTPo=; b=a3ALJnj96F6A8KDtH/ghwxdvjvRhW844jxpbMcDcGZHn+GwUqB9gTyOKtX5y8nh7xq 5GwlYTK4NaGnoAdxM8uD6gnW821RXgEpktWSZawrMVTgIDqbZNdZBFesTsffMEBvKWO+ ucn8a+lZUbO2Ktcp67v1Nwnpv9lXZ0eOBOimbF2DqU9x1nnJBOf6k2Aq8SpBVyFZpE+n w8lf/SaQcAGZ4v344l2VHVf/GOeCIJxOHDYZ67zBqk8ecwW1BG4HGwwOPUcJ/ukNcXrz DFG/ORg1RGVbbG44p/BGziiQ1uyOmTolFU0/GEMuZk6X/Zv1VWRDvmKR1yl8eKZdxsPz rq4A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUb6J3dRvXoDpEil+WdCKkWcwh0fYNj8CXiiRoL0+zhGsFBMOL7 zOU5A9YXIcqWwGEuqDegFpcAYQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycNxLHpepCdAZDZVT6ow79EJPxyGAuh2RMGCeaTido8PFJL0d1hgbj5OP9G9nT13hAtLzTHw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:c50a:: with SMTP id s10mr18670838jam.106.1561825614402; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm4316198iob.67.2019.06.29.09.26.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write To: Scott Bauer Cc: jonathan.derrick@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de" References: <1558471606-25139-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <7ee5d705c12d770bf7566bce7d664bf733b25206.camel@intel.com> <20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:26:52 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190629161947.GA20127@hacktheplanet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote: > > Hey Jens, > > Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell? Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to: #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done) -- Jens Axboe