From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57063C48BD1 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45252610A1 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233632AbhFII5o (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 04:57:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231485AbhFII5n (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 04:57:43 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3202EC061574; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 01:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqtzw-0049sz-5l; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: fix a mistake in grammar From: Johannes Berg To: 13145886936@163.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gushengxian Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:55:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210609081556.19641-1-13145886936@163.com> References: <20210609081556.19641-1-13145886936@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 01:15 -0700, 13145886936@163.com wrote: > > - /* don't allow or configure an mcast address */ > + /* don't allow or configure a mcast address */ Arguable? I'd say "an M-cast" address, and I guess that's why it's written that way. Not sure how else you'd say it, unless you always expand it to "multicast" when reading. johannes