From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
bp@alien8.de, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, zengheng4@huawei.com,
gshan@redhat.com, jic23@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] fs/resctrl: Report a temporary RMID shortage per CLOSID
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:26:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d34a5211-1a8e-43de-9afc-6abab72caa2e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105070934.2258613-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Hi Jinjie,
On 05/11/2026 07:09, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> An RMID that is freed is held in limbo until its cache occupancy drops
> below the threshold, after which it returns to the free list. A request
> that fails because of limbo is thus temporary and worth retrying, which
> resctrl reports to userspace as -EBUSY. A request that fails because
> every RMID is in use is permanent and reported as -ENOSPC.
>
> Where an RMID is only meaningful together with a CLOSID, a request can
> only be satisfied by an RMID belonging to the requested CLOSID, so the
> distinction has to be drawn per CLOSID. Instead it is drawn system wide.
> -ENOSPC is reported when the free list holds no RMID for the requested
> CLOSID, even when that CLOSID has RMIDs in limbo. -EBUSY is reported
> when the free list is empty and another CLOSID has an RMID in limbo,
> even when the requested CLOSID has none. Userspace is thus told to give
> up on a shortage that may clear on its own, and to retry one that cannot
> clear until it removes a group itself.
>
> Architectures where the RMID is independent of the CLOSID always match
> the first entry on the free list, so neither case arises there and only
> MPAM systems are affected.
>
> Draw the distinction from the number of RMIDs the requested CLOSID has
> in limbo where the RMID depends on the CLOSID, and from the system wide
> count otherwise. Drop the separate test for an empty free list, which
> the search handles on its own.
>
> Fixes: c4c0376eefe1 ("x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Thanks for fixing this MPAM oversight.
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Cc: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 7.1.x
> ---
> fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 04e4ea612b7c..b8f4e1ff4083 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -207,9 +207,6 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid)
> struct rmid_entry *itr;
> u32 itr_idx, cmp_idx;
>
> - if (list_empty(&rmid_free_lru))
> - return rmid_limbo_count ? ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) : ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> -
> list_for_each_entry(itr, &rmid_free_lru, list) {
> /*
> * Get the index of this free RMID, and the index it would need
> @@ -225,7 +222,17 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid)
> return itr;
> }
>
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> + /*
> + * No free RMID matched. If this CLOSID has RMIDs in limbo, return
> + * -EBUSY so userspace can retry. Otherwise, the CLOSID is genuinely
> + * out of RMIDs. When RMIDs are not per-CLOSID, any RMID in limbo
> + * delays the allocation.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
> + return closid_num_dirty_rmid[closid] ? ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) :
> + ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> +
> + return rmid_limbo_count ? ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) : ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> }
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 7:09 [PATCH v4 0/3] fs/resctrl: Fix RMID limbo handling Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-05 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] fs/resctrl: Report a temporary RMID shortage per CLOSID Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-05 11:26 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2026-11-05 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/resctrl: Do not allocate a monitor context when releasing limbo RMIDs Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-05 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/resctrl: Unmount resctrl with the CDP state it was mounted with Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d34a5211-1a8e-43de-9afc-6abab72caa2e@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®