From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752221AbdJDOPT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:19 -0400 Received: from g9t1613g.houston.hpe.com ([15.241.32.99]:60201 "EHLO g9t1613g.houston.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbdJDOPS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/kernel: Provide a means to disable TSC ART To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Bin Gao , Prarit Bhargava , Dimitri Sivanich , Andrew Banman , Russ Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org References: <20171002151214.822224274@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> <20171002151217.095807201@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> <20171004092704.mm4q5ivrlfrcj6sk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Mike Travis Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 07:15:17 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171004092704.mm4q5ivrlfrcj6sk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/4/2017 2:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:12:18AM -0500, mike.travis@hpe.com wrote: >> static void detect_art(void) >> { >> unsigned int unused[2]; >> >> - if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < ART_CPUID_LEAF) >> + if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < ART_CPUID_LEAF || tsc_art_disabled) >> return; >> >> /* Don't enable ART in a VM, non-stop TSC and TSC_ADJUST required */ > > > So why can't we use is_uv_system() here an for the tsc_adjust thing? I could. I just thought that there may be future system arches that need the same facility? > > Also (and I hate the name) tsc_multi_sync_resets is the reason you > cannot use ART, I don't think it makes sense to introduce yet another > knob. > Okay. I wasn't sure if there might be different causes for wanting one condition over the other. So does this mean change this later test to use is_uv_system() or tsc_multi_sync_resets? Thanks.