From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753233AbdJ3Lls (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:41:48 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:61627 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751476AbdJ3Llp (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:41:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Adjustments for a lot of function implementations
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Muralidharan Karicheri <mkaricheri@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
References: <f9dc652b-4fca-37aa-0b72-8c9e6a828da9@users.sourceforge.net>
 <356f75b2-d303-7f10-b76c-95e2f686bd3c@xs4all.nl>
 <14619198-bebe-d215-5324-a14fbc2103fb@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710301745530.2160@hadrien>
 <ebf37d57-38c6-b3de-5a66-dbb1c13fd63a@xs4all.nl>
 <049aa1b4-6291-ec24-1ffb-77ae8d1cdb63@users.sourceforge.net>
 <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <d3901527-efe8-c36e-97c6-3407ead63370@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:41:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gAywrZUAkEtzUxQGLbFOa+pL3NIuAQWk1DsifJqWbNwDOQIylz3
 Px+j2p/FtNBi9rQmvphnSsgJKJcAlr17bq2/1LI3/SE9mB2gXgbYRjidFElGJmljX2ym8Ud
 PlJNyMS8MeraOjZx/8DzbvMuubGJNcYtUPSkXdQ5+uACaS8JoLBmp2KvbTb0NOZH7yUsDG8
 Oan2PjNlA+gvtb+K528Lw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:7uePyrP0bjY=:Wh83/JFtFDkPHstJajivp4
 ZIccEJHtzU1i6QpIaIsUmLprARTtlSyrAZIlk5jLyGYs8daJ1CRhoKc3DYMsFH7qlpCHmdl5N
 sdOT4VrpBXi/KHonfgx9xZC/GoFrJibc6APWRZsTXD3hhyVymhLHklUE7nRcIiX71fZ2OwJbE
 AjFQ48OOn5fS4xlu2CkTDpVm9FVVxxuKwbxtJMlsFlsGBXS47nawCtm9eYaJTE7iKgV6afaH1
 s7jopr1dhpW0Em6TZgZ71lxqDuD9+hurg0jsPu3T98S5P4mRbmsxX9+HtBQy2fo7svTNLtnnp
 ZkLK8LN7555lcDmh/LjtZ5t62lOtqTvK2lctuw1A9nUo4Ucjvl9HhRSbkPdiQL+hFIS5DRZs0
 aiEKfdvP/rFHW36i0n5EYwMrOXsgs8f4tMH+Zv78m/93XhM970fGphN5aeq/7v2VkWvWvV1v0
 tE7Lkpl7iR9P8A25VaFoTyS6LOVVJvvZ53Hhp9TFVgtE+sCZEp4RxlgXHqH3G5CenDyuQuCoX
 7Fnls0RBqgcVZrhcGK3bEoA+Uiq2/GGJApYxyugAp7vFjBsLHmPpjvpw9m0r23DarDxalICdp
 OOF0sdvFPdZ/uwZFdrOvbFeIC4ZVlWduhNtl5he5cAmibS2mmPRBGlcyqNq/hWEas+2cnsy7q
 z7SzthOqiGoSlEHc88EL4GlA++a5KRzQvhYxb24ziGv0B9mb9FoRIVpYKJdI5v2ErvNg4uqfw
 MBc5YjsOSkXEwXoIcHkuxDUlYcuORoloqutL5r4S74jCbTvE1a5V5SbSor1TWLat3LMgfGuW3
 5GsQJtWtn4mqjeh4kZ0Glho+jsr6pJtXCXxSdGfXqMvSn/zcQw=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Yes, and you were told not to do it

I have got an other impression.


> like that again.

I continued with the presentation of suggestions from my selection
of change possibilities.
It seems that there are very different expectations for the
preferred patch granularity.

Can it happen again that you are going to use a development tool
like “quilt” (as a maintainer) for the desired recombination
of possible update steps?

Regards,
Markus