From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jianyong Wu" <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 00/16] Cache aware scheduling enhancements
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 17:04:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d39137ce-312f-4c67-b14d-d769dda95d63@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69ff1b28-10d1-4c45-b32b-00d27da5180e@amd.com>
Hi Prateek,
On 5/20/2026 11:05 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Tim, Chenyu,
>
> On 5/14/2026 2:09 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
>> This patch set contains cache-aware scheduling enhancements
>> and bug fixes on top of Peter's sched/cache branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=sched/cache
>
> I took the latest queue:sched/core for a spin before and after
> the sched/cache merge and everything is now looking fine.
>
> I've temporary lost access to my usual test machine so I could only grab
> the microbenchmark data but they are mostly positive to unaffected as
> expected. I'll update if I see anything funky with longer running
> benchmarks if and when I get a chance.
>
[ ... ]
>
> Thanks a ton! And sorry for not having been the most responsive on the
> latest iterations.
>
Thanks very much for your help with this series!
I have kicked off the server-side tests based on sched/core.
I suppose cache-aware scheduling can still leverage sd_llc_share
after applying Peter’s patch and yours, allowing the sched domain
share data for SD_SHARE_LLC and SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY to coexist.
Additionally, since sched/core includes optimizations for selecting
SMT cores during asymmetric-capacity wakeups, I have also set up
big.LITTLE systems for testing. One testbed features P-cores with
SMT enabled while E-cores run without SMT support. I am simply curious
to see how the benchmark data turns out.
thanks,
Chenyu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 20:39 Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 01/16] sched/cache: Allow only 1 thread of the process to calculate the LLC occupancy Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 02/16] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 03/16] sched/cache: Skip cache-aware scheduling for single-threaded processes Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 04/16] sched/cache: Calculate the LLC size and store it in sched_domain Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 05/16] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 06/16] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 07/16] sched/cache: Fix rcu warning when accessing sd_llc domain Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 08/16] sched/cache: Fix potential NULL mm pointer access Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 09/16] sched/cache: Annotate lockless accesses to mm->sc_stat.cpu Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 10/16] sched/cache: Fix unpaired account_llc_enqueue/dequeue Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 11/16] sched/cache: Fix checking active load balance by only considering the CFS task Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 12/16] sched/cache: Fix race condition during sched domain rebuild Tim Chen
2026-05-18 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 5:41 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 13/16] sched/cache: Fix cache aware scheduling enabling for multi LLCs system Tim Chen
2026-05-18 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-19 5:52 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 14/16] sched/cache: Fix has_multi_llcs iff at least one partition has multiple LLCs Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 15/16] sched/cache: Fix possible overflow when invalidating the preferred CPU Tim Chen
2026-05-18 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 16/16] sched/cache: Fix stale preferred_llc for a new task Tim Chen
2026-05-20 3:05 ` [Patch v4 00/16] Cache aware scheduling enhancements K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-20 9:04 ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d39137ce-312f-4c67-b14d-d769dda95d63@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luogengkun2@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®