From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777E8EB64D7 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 07:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229884AbjFZHlU (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2023 03:41:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35624 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229691AbjFZHlP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2023 03:41:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6741B0 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9896216338cso225568266b.3 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:41:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1687765272; x=1690357272; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zA7Cm37wj3yQ3D5wBwKXWhe4kq3EmRcED9N0uqF2kvQ=; b=I/wb10rpkLePRZPQqPL0pgR4L5G+sfRmXWEKD7G+t2jo/R5hpYeMtBmaLkXSjbNfwh m4nDPTipwLaUyzkP2QLaQFplIX4cFdrFGhv9E5VfyNyEUIiG50TM8QByb3Dtg7AYDaSZ tfm5yt41F0dQ9GPbXtIEZEwWB0xMONHkDdAEas0dcaIh7wsVZsNxKmmkgWR8FmtDcMby usUy4CFd4Y1tDPJcFK8aMYPJhCkz347nzYXDyshAKxj4w2YHV9/N0aoU8nwF7/7mAs6s zU468STNhnXGkgDHmRdbpjfQxbkdfOohKmNpcx3VzUX3bWj0DDLHbM5vNgc3C1+9Xdtf F8eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687765272; x=1690357272; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zA7Cm37wj3yQ3D5wBwKXWhe4kq3EmRcED9N0uqF2kvQ=; b=Gb4QJhUxC8e/KHL0nS4g7HtJM8axoYTTsCkFPaj2qfLbDn5VJCxubCSVS78ascWyPw FJ4jt5MbzWrvW6/evV4elG+UEbMFT/6FvDbehVidNjEIhL0HIVmwmrQfIAP4CtRUoku6 CQ89PVZOAWvTfGfM6sNKpI1AXsGPuBVygtJ+5uXxuRscpJfPfz7occgEjdl9pqpK5KXM MIlGjQnsIMmdyAznZ+Tk7Qy8N96cj4NY+hwnNxFIrkcD+MODI9TEYjc9IMjACRKMq5/B rxr3cl4uPJQLfTnWuuFYaVm3qPT4w3biRf2qh//wOfXftUqN7W0KyxFaxk3Mb58ekRIU ZdYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwSw+XnYb9fEeKTHvDh0GscgPZX+nJOmvrQwxF3tSbtc6WnWfZ3 ULmMNJOYiXZGMgG+63MS0X1gxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6Tv5NqF4SmF0qc5/rrLjA1ARSlgDmMBu++P0KZeJI4PYADGMrZs/OxnOVDb9cA3kIGJK1k7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:86aa:b0:989:5d1a:a558 with SMTP id qa42-20020a17090786aa00b009895d1aa558mr14941181ejc.61.1687765272276; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.219.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gu3-20020a170906f28300b0096f71ace804sm2969110ejb.99.2023.06.26.00.41.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:41:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for sdm845 by adding reg-names Content-Language: en-US To: Luca Weiss , Rob Herring Cc: Abel Vesa , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , "Martin K . Petersen" , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20230623113009.2512206-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> <20230623113009.2512206-6-abel.vesa@linaro.org> <20230623211746.GA1128583-robh@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/06/2023 08:38, Luca Weiss wrote: >>>> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded. >>> >>> Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to >>> find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with >>> my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten >>> forgotten. >> >> There was an error reported on the above series. Why would it be >> applied? > > The error report at [0] complains about reg-names but I'm quite sure > that patch 2/3 resolves this error. Does your bot only apply one patch > at a time and run the check or apply all of them and then run it? It's > been a while but I'm fairly sure I ran all of the checks before sending > since I also documented some other patches in the cover letter there. You did it in cover letter, not in the patch, so there is no dependency for bots recorded. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/167241769341.1925758.17856681634949446114.robh@kernel.org/ Your patch 2/3 could not be applied to any tree. 3/3 applied but without previous one caused warnings. Best regards, Krzysztof