mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 15:29:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4597983118d832fc958c1d4707672a4b250a405.1526048005.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1526048005.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

Fill in the few extra bits and annotations needed to make the driver
work properly as a module, and jiggle the Kconfig to expose the
driver-level ARM_CCI_PMU option.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---

Preserving the current level of configurability does end up allowing a
rather pointless module configuration which supports no hardware variants,
but I couldn't find a way to enforce "at least one sub-option selected"
logic without Kbuild claiming a recursive dependency.

 drivers/perf/Kconfig   | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
index 28bb5a029558..269331bfb746 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
@@ -6,30 +6,33 @@ menu "Performance monitor support"
 	depends on PERF_EVENTS
 
 config ARM_CCI_PMU
-	bool
+	tristate "ARM CCI PMU driver"
 	select ARM_CCI
+	help
+	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI (Cache Coherent
+	  Interconnect) family of products.
+
+	  If compiled as a module, it will be called arm-cci.
 
 config ARM_CCI400_PMU
-	bool "ARM CCI400 PMU support"
+	bool "support CCI-400"
+	default y
 	depends on (ARM && CPU_V7) || ARM64
+	depends on ARM_CCI_PMU
 	select ARM_CCI400_COMMON
-	select ARM_CCI_PMU
 	help
-	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-400 (cache coherent
-	  interconnect). CCI-400 supports counting events related to the
-	  connected slave/master interfaces.
+	  CCI-400 provides 4 independent event counters counting events related
+	  to the connected slave/master interfaces, plus a cycle counter.
 
 config ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
-	bool "ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 PMU support"
+	bool "support CCI-500/CCI-550"
+	default y
 	depends on (ARM && CPU_V7) || ARM64
-	select ARM_CCI_PMU
+	depends on ARM_CCI_PMU
 	help
-	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 cache
-	  coherent interconnects. Both of them provide 8 independent event counters,
-	  which can count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well
-	  as the internal events to the CCI.
-
-	  If unsure, say Y
+	  CCI-500/CCI-550 both provide 8 independent event counters, which can
+	  count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well as the
+	  internal events to the CCI.
 
 config ARM_CCN
 	tristate "ARM CCN driver support"
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
index 7029d8fe8f44..09938dd8eb6f 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
@@ -1416,6 +1416,7 @@ static int cci_pmu_init(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pmu_format_attr_group.attrs = model->format_attrs;
 
 	cci_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
+		.module		= THIS_MODULE,
 		.name		= cci_pmu->model->name,
 		.task_ctx_nr	= perf_invalid_context,
 		.pmu_enable	= cci_pmu_enable,
@@ -1581,6 +1582,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
 #endif
 	{},
 };
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_cci_pmu_matches);
 
 static bool is_duplicate_irq(int irq, int *irqs, int nr_irqs)
 {
@@ -1702,14 +1704,27 @@ static int cci_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int cci_pmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	if (!g_cci_pmu)
+		return 0;
+
+	cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CCI_ONLINE);
+	perf_pmu_unregister(&g_cci_pmu->pmu);
+	g_cci_pmu = NULL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct platform_driver cci_pmu_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		   .name = DRIVER_NAME,
 		   .of_match_table = arm_cci_pmu_matches,
 		  },
 	.probe = cci_pmu_probe,
+	.remove = cci_pmu_remove,
 };
 
-builtin_platform_driver(cci_pmu_driver);
+module_platform_driver(cci_pmu_driver);
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ARM CCI PMU support");
-- 
2.17.0.dirty

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-11 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-11 14:29 [PATCH 0/3] perf: make Arm CCI driver modular Robin Murphy
2018-05-11 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/arm-cc*: Fix MODULE_LICENSE() tags Robin Murphy
2018-05-11 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/arm-cci: Remove pointless PMU disabling Robin Murphy
2018-05-11 14:38   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-11 14:29 ` Robin Murphy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4597983118d832fc958c1d4707672a4b250a405.1526048005.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®