From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request directly
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:27:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d46af0a7-62f3-4988-2b1c-857378282356@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543995842-20704-3-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
On 12/5/18 12:44 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Merge blk_mq_try_issue_directly and __blk_mq_try_issue_directly
> into one interface to unify the interfaces to issue requests
> directly. The merged interface takes over the requests totally,
> it could insert, end or do nothing based on the return value of
> .queue_rq and 'bypass' parameter. Then caller needn't any other
> handling any more and then code could be cleaned up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 153af90..fe92e52 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1815,93 +1815,85 @@ static bool blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(struct request *rq)
> return req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_WRITE;
> }
>
> -static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +static blk_status_t blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> struct request *rq,
> blk_qc_t *cookie,
> - bool bypass_insert, bool last)
> + bool bypass, bool last)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> bool run_queue = true;
> + blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + int srcu_idx;
> bool force = false;
>
> + if (!blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(rq)) {
> + /*
> + * Insert request to hctx dispatch list for 'bypass == true'
> + * case, otherwise, the caller will fail forever.
> + */
> + if (bypass)
> + force = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
Same here, of course.
Otherwise looks fine.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-05 7:43 [PATCH V9 0/4] blk-mq: refactor code of issue directly Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 7:43 ` [PATCH V9 1/4] blk-mq: insert to hctx dispatch list when bypass_insert is true Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 16:25 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-06 1:12 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-05 7:44 ` [PATCH V9 2/4] blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request directly Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 16:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-12-06 1:12 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-05 7:44 ` [PATCH V9 3/4] blk-mq: issue directly with bypass 'false' in blk_mq_sched_insert_requests Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-06 1:11 ` jianchao.wang
2018-12-06 2:13 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 7:44 ` [PATCH V9 4/4] blk-mq: replace and kill blk_mq_request_issue_directly Jianchao Wang
2018-12-05 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d46af0a7-62f3-4988-2b1c-857378282356@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®