mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v4
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:16:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4753ea7-44b3-9c5f-3bb8-4a6654ccea88@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180104095325.GB13091@infradead.org>

Am 04.01.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> This seems to collide with my dma direct/swiotlb series posted recently.
>
>> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
>> @@ -490,11 +490,11 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(phys_addr_t orig_addr, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> -phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> -				   dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
>> -				   phys_addr_t orig_addr, size_t size,
>> -				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> -				   unsigned long attrs)
>> +static phys_addr_t tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> +				  dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
>> +				  phys_addr_t orig_addr, size_t size,
>> +				  enum dma_data_direction dir,
>> +				  unsigned long attrs, bool warn)
> We already have DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN which can be passed in attrs.  Please
> use it instead of reinventing it.
>
>>   swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>>   		       dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags)
>>   {
>> +	bool warn = !(flags & __GFP_NOWARN);
>>   	dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>>   	void *ret;
>>   	int order = get_order(size);
>> @@ -739,7 +750,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>>   		 * will grab memory from the lowest available address range.
>>   		 */
>>   		phys_addr_t paddr = map_single(hwdev, 0, size,
>> -					       DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0);
>> +					       DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0, warn);
> Note: in my above series swiotlb_alloc_coherent is going away, and
> replaced with a swiotlb_alloc that takes a dma_attrs argument.

That's what I thought about as well, but this is a bug fix for stable 
kernels. So the changes should be as small as possible.

But using DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN is a good point, going to send a v5 which 
uses this instead.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Using that for passing the nowarn flag is the right way to go instead
> of using __GFP_NOWARN.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-04  9:32 Christian König
2018-01-04  9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-04 10:16   ` Christian König [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4753ea7-44b3-9c5f-3bb8-4a6654ccea88@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®