From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>, <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:16:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d476aa51-f855-bfb8-0738-3190439a2f72@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303223859.273187-1-jarkko@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 3/3/2022 2:38 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> There is a limited amount of SGX memory (EPC) on each system. When that
> memory is used up, SGX has its own swapping mechanism which is similar
> in concept but totally separate from the core mm/* code. Instead of
> swapping to disk, SGX swaps from EPC to normal RAM. That normal RAM
> comes from a shared memory pseudo-file and can itself be swapped by the
> core mm code. There is a hierarchy like this:
>
> EPC <-> shmem <-> disk
>
> After data is swapped back in from shmem to EPC, the shmem backing
> storage needs to be freed. Currently, the backing shmem is not freed.
> This effectively wastes the shmem while the enclave is running. The
> memory is recovered when the enclave is destroyed and the backing
> storage freed.
>
> Sort this out by freeing memory with shmem_truncate_range(), as soon as
> a page is faulted back to the EPC. In addition, free the memory for
> PCMD pages as soon as all PCMD's in a page have been marked as unused
> by zeroing its contents.
>
> Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer")
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
I can reliably reproduce the issue this patch aims to solve by creating
a virtual machine that has a significant portion of its memory consumed
by EPC:
qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 4 -m 4G\
-enable-kvm \
-cpu host,+sgx-provisionkey \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,host-nodes=0,policy=bind,id=node0 \
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem0,size=1536M,prealloc=on,host-nodes=0,policy=bind \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=node0 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=2G,host-nodes=1,policy=bind,id=node1 \
-object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=1536M,prealloc=on,host-nodes=1,policy=bind \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=node1 \
-M sgx-epc.0.memdev=mem0,sgx-epc.0.node=0,sgx-epc.1.memdev=mem1,sgx-epc.1.node=1 \
...
Before this patch, running the very stressful SGX2 over subscription test case
(unclobbered_vdso_oversubscribed_remove) in this environment always triggers
the oom-killer but no amount of tasks killed can save the system
with it always ending deadlocked on memory:
[ 58.642719] Tasks state (memory values in pages):
[ 58.644324] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name
[ 58.647237] [ 195] 0 195 3153 197 45056 0 -1000 systemd-udevd
[ 58.650238] [ 281] 0 281 1836367 0 10817536 0 0 test_sgx
[ 58.653088] Out of memory and no killable processes...
[ 58.654832] Kernel panic - not syncing: System is deadlocked on memory
After applying this patch I was able to run SGX2 selftest
unclobbered_vdso_oversubscribed_remove ten times successfully.
Tested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 22:38 Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-08 11:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-08 19:16 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-03-09 8:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-10 18:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-11 0:15 ` [tip: x86/sgx] " tip-bot2 for Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-11 19:09 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d476aa51-f855-bfb8-0738-3190439a2f72@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®