From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sumit.gupta@nvidia.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
superm1@kernel.org, zhangpengjie2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Preserve global boost state on failed updates
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 08:45:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4a8d9fb-5ccf-4313-b69e-22b330aa145a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2291138c-0e2b-4625-b982-8d72a43c23be@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 11/5/26 08:41, Zhongqiu Han wrote:
> On 11/5/2026 12:16 AM, Christian Loehle wrote:
>> cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() restores the opposite of the requested
>> state when updating policy boost state fails. For example, a failed
>> write of 0 when global boost is already disabled enables the global
>> flag without enabling any policies.
>>
>> Save the original global boost state using a mutex and restore it on
>> failure.
>>
>> Fixes: 121baab7b88e ("cpufreq: Force sync policy boost with global boost on sysfs update")
>> Fixes: 6f19efc0a1ca ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core")
>
> It seems the only appropriate Fixes tag here is 121baab7b88e ("cpufreq:
> Force sync policy boost with global boost on sysfs update"). Commit
> 6f19efc0a1ca ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") did not
> have this issue, since it returned early when the state was unchanged:
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled == state)
> return 0;
Yes, that wouldn't flip it, although still race between sysfs writers.
>
> so restoring "!state" on failure was equivalent to restoring the old
> value. 121baab7b88e removed that check, which is what introduced the
> bug.
>
> Also, is the new mutex meant to address a separate race between
> concurrent sysfs writers? If so, it would be good to mention that in the
> commit message or using separate patch?
Yes indeed, otherwise we could fold it into cpufreq_driver_lock.
I can split the two including the Fixes tag
>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>> ---
>> On a platform without boost_supported the unfixed behaviour is:
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 0
>> # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> echo: write error: invalid argument
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 0
>> # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> echo: write error: invalid argument
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 1
>>
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 54dde8419bdc..d95c849f79c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -2810,18 +2810,24 @@ int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_set_sw);
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_boost_mutex);
>> +
>> static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>> {
>> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + bool boost_enabled;
>> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + guard(mutex)(&cpufreq_boost_mutex);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Don't compare 'cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled' with 'state' here to
>> * make sure all policies are in sync with global boost flag.
>> */
>> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> + boost_enabled = cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled;
>> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = state;
>> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> @@ -2841,7 +2847,7 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>> return 0;
>> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> - cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
>> + cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = boost_enabled;
>> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 16:16 Christian Loehle
2026-11-05 3:09 ` Pengjie Zhang
2026-11-05 8:41 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-11-05 8:45 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4a8d9fb-5ccf-4313-b69e-22b330aa145a@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.gupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhangpengjie2@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®