mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sumit.gupta@nvidia.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
	superm1@kernel.org, zhangpengjie2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Preserve global boost state on failed updates
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 08:45:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4a8d9fb-5ccf-4313-b69e-22b330aa145a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2291138c-0e2b-4625-b982-8d72a43c23be@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 11/5/26 08:41, Zhongqiu Han wrote:
> On 11/5/2026 12:16 AM, Christian Loehle wrote:
>> cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() restores the opposite of the requested
>> state when updating policy boost state fails. For example, a failed
>> write of 0 when global boost is already disabled enables the global
>> flag without enabling any policies.
>>
>> Save the original global boost state using a mutex and restore it on
>> failure.
>>
>> Fixes: 121baab7b88e ("cpufreq: Force sync policy boost with global boost on sysfs update")
>> Fixes: 6f19efc0a1ca ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core")
> 
> It seems the only appropriate Fixes tag here is 121baab7b88e ("cpufreq:
> Force sync policy boost with global boost on sysfs update"). Commit
> 6f19efc0a1ca ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") did not
> have this issue, since it returned early when the state was unchanged:
> 
>     if (cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled == state)
>         return 0;

Yes, that wouldn't flip it, although still race between sysfs writers.

> 
> so restoring "!state" on failure was equivalent to restoring the old
> value. 121baab7b88e removed that check, which is what introduced the
> bug.
> 
> Also, is the new mutex meant to address a separate race between
> concurrent sysfs writers? If so, it would be good to mention that in the
> commit message or using separate patch?

Yes indeed, otherwise we could fold it into cpufreq_driver_lock.
I can split the two including the Fixes tag

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>> ---
>> On a platform without boost_supported the unfixed behaviour is:
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 0
>> # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> echo: write error: invalid argument
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 0
>> # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> echo: write error: invalid argument
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
>> 1
>>
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 54dde8419bdc..d95c849f79c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -2810,18 +2810,24 @@ int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_set_sw);
>>   +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_boost_mutex);
>> +
>>   static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>>   {
>>       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>>       unsigned long flags;
>> +    bool boost_enabled;
>>       int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   +    guard(mutex)(&cpufreq_boost_mutex);
>> +
>>       /*
>>        * Don't compare 'cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled' with 'state' here to
>>        * make sure all policies are in sync with global boost flag.
>>        */
>>         write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> +    boost_enabled = cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled;
>>       cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = state;
>>       write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>>   @@ -2841,7 +2847,7 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>>           return 0;
>>         write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> -    cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
>> +    cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = boost_enabled;
>>       write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>>         pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04 16:16 Christian Loehle
2026-11-05  3:09 ` Pengjie Zhang
2026-11-05  8:41 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-11-05  8:45   ` Christian Loehle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4a8d9fb-5ccf-4313-b69e-22b330aa145a@arm.com \
    --to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.gupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhangpengjie2@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®