Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver

[Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>]

On 10/10/23 11:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 09-10-23, 17:06, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/23 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>> This patch set adds below improvements to the Tegra194 CPUFREQ driver.
>>> They are applicable to all the Tegra SoC's supported by the driver.
>>>
>>> 1) Patch 1: Avoid making SMP call on every frequency request to reduce
>>>      the time for frequency set and get calls.
>>>
>>> 2) Patch 2: Use reference clock count based loop instead of udelay()
>>>      to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU frequency.
>>>
>>> The patches are not related but have minor conflict. So, need to be
>>> applied in order of patch numbers. If 'Patch 2' is to be applied first
>>> then will rebase that and send separately.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v1[2] -> v3:
>>> - Patch 1: used sizeof(*data->cpu_data) in devm_kcalloc().
>>>
>>> v1[1] -> v2:
>>> - Patch 1: added new patch.
>>> - Patch 2: changed subject and patch order.
>>>
>>> Sumit Gupta (2):
>>>     cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls
>>>     cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay
>>>
>>>    drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>    1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901164113.29139-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901152046.25662-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>>
>>
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> If there is no further comment.
>> Can we please still apply these patches for 6.7 ?
> 
> Applied. Thanks.
> 
> FWIW, you should have rebased the other commit (which removes cpu
> online mask) over this one. I had to fix the commit manually now.
> 
> --
> viresh

Sorry, my bad.
Thank you for your help.

Best Regards,
Sumit Gupta