mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Madore" <michael.madore@gmail.com>
To: "David Lang" <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lockup/reboots on multiple dual core Opteron systems
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:02:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4b6d3ea0604141102i7e50cfbdna04485fe2ae5c1d8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604140937440.17345@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

On 4/14/06, David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Michael Madore wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several dozen systems based on the AMD 8111/8131 chipset which
> > are experiencing lockups or reboots while under heavy stress.  All
> > systems are configured identically:
> >
> > (2) dual core Opteron 285 processors
> > 8 GB RAM
> > 1 IDE hard disk
> >
> > When the lockup occurs, there is no information printed to the screen,
> > and magic sysrq does not work.   The systems will often lockup within
> > a matter of hours, but sometimes they can run for several days before
> > locking up.
> >
> > The testing involves:
> >
> > 1) Allocate several GB of memory from each node and read/write to it.
> > 2) Perform lots of disk I/O
> > 3) Keep all cores busy
> >
> > I see the lockup no matter which kernel I try:
> >
> > 2.6.5 (SLES 9)
> > 2.6.9 (RHEL 4)
> > 2.6.16 (kernel.org)
> >
> > The systems will run perfectly stable under the following conditions:
> >
> > 1) Use a 32-bit kernel
> > or
> > 2) Boot 64-bit kernel with mem=3000M
> > or
> > 3) Don't perform any disk I/O during the test
> >
> > I have also tested the dual core 8GB combination on both NForce and
> > Serverworks based motherboards with the same results.  In this case
> > both systems were using SATA hard disks instead of IDE.
> >
> > Any ideas what the culprit could be?
> >
> > Mike
>
> I'm fighting similar problems on one machine at home (single dual core, 4G
> ram nforce 939 motherboard, 1 ide, 10 3ware, 1 adaptec controlled drives).
> It's locked up under the ubuntu and gentoo install disk kernels. I did
> have it running for a day and a half under 2.6.17-rc1, but I managed to
> corrupt the install and haven't gotten back to that kernel yet to confirm
> it's long-term stability.

Who makes your motherboard?  Also, how do you trigger the lockup?

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-14 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-14 16:48 Michael Madore
2006-04-14 16:39 ` David Lang
2006-04-14 18:02   ` Michael Madore [this message]
2006-04-14 18:00     ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4b6d3ea0604141102i7e50cfbdna04485fe2ae5c1d8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=michael.madore@gmail.com \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®