From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878B1C433F5 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349249AbiETMbl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 08:31:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243910AbiETMbj (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 08:31:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6E6B2273 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 05:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF1C1477; Fri, 20 May 2022 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.1.145] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6CB23F718; Fri, 20 May 2022 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:31:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] arch_topology: Don't set cluster identifier as physical package identifier Content-Language: en-US To: Sudeep Holla , Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Qing Wang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring References: <20220518093325.2070336-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220518093325.2070336-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann In-Reply-To: <20220518093325.2070336-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/05/2022 11:33, Sudeep Holla wrote: You say `cluster identifier` which to me refers to `cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id`. But I guess you meant `cluster node` from cpu-map DT node? Otherwise you say we link (1.level) cpu-map cluster nodes to `cluster_id\_sibling`? But then (1) we will never support nested clusters and (2) why would we need llc support then? [...]