mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
	"Vadapalli, Siddharth" <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
	"Vardhan, Vibhore" <vibhore@ti.com>
Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Use nvmem to model the efuses
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:55:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4d79dea-2c7f-4160-9008-23f5bee1550a@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025154339.1270246-1-afd@ti.com>

+ Siddharth for CSPW driver, + Vibhore of CPUFreq

On 25/10/23 21:13, Andrew Davis wrote:
> The nvmem subsystem is used to model efuse areas. Currently our efuse
> areas are described using raw syscon nodes and offsets into that. The
> use case for this efuse area is to store the SoC Ethernet MAC address.
> This is already such a commonly supported use case that both the nvmem
> and networking subsystem have built-in support for it. Use that here
> to get the following:
> 
> 1. More standard, complete, and accurate description of this hardware
>    efuse area.
> 
> 2. Remove the need for this custom 'ti,syscon-efuse' property (which
>    I'm surprised was accepted into the binding in the first place..)
> 
> 3. Allow the parent node to not have to be a syscon which fixes a DT
>    check warning.
> 

Sounds like a good plan to me.

> RFC for now as we don't have a simple generic compatible for memory
> mapped nvmem areas. For now we use the 'uniphier-efuse' compatible
> as it is essentially just a generic mmio nvmem area, which means any
> generic area is technically "compatible".
> 

Looking at drivers/nvmem/ its seems like each SoC arch seems to have
their own individual efuse driver?

For K3 SoCs (at least AM62), there are other properties in addition to
MAC address in the eFUSE which are useful for different drivers such as
Speed grades. Can this be extended for the same?

> If this all is acceptable I'll split this patch into three and do
> the same for all the other K3 devices still using this odd
> 'ti,syscon-efuse' pattern for v1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi      | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index 05d6ef127ba78..8f488d43d49df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -34,13 +34,30 @@ k3_reset: reset-controller {
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> -	mcu_conf: syscon@40f00000 {
> -		compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> +	mcu_conf: bus@40f00000 {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
>  		reg = <0x0 0x40f00000 0x0 0x20000>;
>  		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		#size-cells = <1>;
>  		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x40f00000 0x20000>;
>  
> +		efuse@200 {
> +			compatible = "socionext,uniphier-efuse";
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <1>;
> +			reg = <0x200 0x40>;
> +
> +			nvmem-layout {
> +				compatible = "fixed-layout";
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +				mac_address: mac@0 {
> +					reg = <0x0 0x6>;
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
>  		phy_gmii_sel: phy@4040 {
>  			compatible = "ti,am654-phy-gmii-sel";
>  			reg = <0x4040 0x4>;
> @@ -533,7 +550,8 @@ cpsw_port1: port@1 {
>  				reg = <1>;
>  				ti,mac-only;
>  				label = "port1";
> -				ti,syscon-efuse = <&mcu_conf 0x200>;
> +				nvmem-cells = <&mac_address>;
> +				nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address";
>  				phys = <&phy_gmii_sel 1>;
>  			};
>  		};

-- 
Regards
Vignesh

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-30  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 15:43 Andrew Davis
2023-10-30  4:25 ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]
2023-11-03 15:36   ` Andrew Davis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d4d79dea-2c7f-4160-9008-23f5bee1550a@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=vibhore@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®