From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fair round robin algorithm for vmbus_get_outgoing_channel()
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:30:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d503b43941504d17a33d307426e739db@SIXPR30MB031.064d.mgd.msft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430154256-26853-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:04
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fair round robin algorithm for
> vmbus_get_outgoing_channel()
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Address Dexuan's review comments:
> PATCH 3/6: s,channel,primary_channel;
> PATCH 4/6: add a forward declaration instead of moving code around;
> PATCH 6/6: fix an off-by-one
> - Change the algorithm in PATCH 6/6:
> Instead of a simple round robin we first try to find a (sub)channel with
> the current_cpu == target_cpu and we fallback to a round robin when we
> fail
> to find one.
>
> K. Y., Dexuan, can you please give it a spin in various testing environments
> you have? Thanks!
>
> Original description:
>
> This series is a continuation of the "Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use a round-robin
> algorithm for picking the outgoing channel" work. It is supposed to bring
> two
> significant changes:
> 1) Subchannels for a channel are distributed evenly across all vcpus we have.
> Currently we try to distribute all channels (including subchannels) across
> all vcpus, this approach doesn't guarantee that the particular channel's
> subchannels will be distributed in the same way as we process all offer
> requests in some random order. (Patch 05)
> 2) Channel picking based on the current vcpu is dropped from
> vmbus_get_outgoing_channel() in favor of a fair round robin. (Patch 06)
> (this
> is not true anymore, see 'Changes').
>
> Patches 01 - 04 are cleanup/refactoring.
>
> Vitaly Kuznetsov (6):
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: unify calls to percpu_channel_enq()
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: briefly comment num_sc and next_oc
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: decrease num_sc on subchannel removal
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: move init_vp_index() call to vmbus_process_offer()
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: distribute subchannels among all vcpus
> Drivers: hv: vmbus: improve selection of an outgoing channel
>
> drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> -----------
> include/linux/hyperv.h | 12 +++--
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> --
Patch 1, 2 and 3 are good to me.
We'll have to test 4~6 for performance change.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-27 17:04 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: unify calls to percpu_channel_enq() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: briefly comment num_sc and next_oc Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: decrease num_sc on subchannel removal Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: move init_vp_index() call to vmbus_process_offer() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: distribute subchannels among all vcpus Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: improve selection of an outgoing channel Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-28 4:30 ` Dexuan Cui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d503b43941504d17a33d307426e739db@SIXPR30MB031.064d.mgd.msft.net \
--to=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®