mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fair round robin algorithm for vmbus_get_outgoing_channel()
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:30:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d503b43941504d17a33d307426e739db@SIXPR30MB031.064d.mgd.msft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430154256-26853-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:04
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fair round robin algorithm for
> vmbus_get_outgoing_channel()
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Address Dexuan's review comments:
>   PATCH 3/6: s,channel,primary_channel;
>   PATCH 4/6: add a forward declaration instead of moving code around;
>   PATCH 6/6: fix an off-by-one
> - Change the algorithm in PATCH 6/6:
>   Instead of a simple round robin we first try to find a (sub)channel with
>   the current_cpu == target_cpu and we fallback to a round robin when we
> fail
>   to find one.
> 
> K. Y., Dexuan, can you please give it a spin in various testing environments
> you have? Thanks!
> 
> Original description:
> 
> This series is a continuation of the "Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use a round-robin
> algorithm for picking the outgoing channel" work. It is supposed to bring
> two
> significant changes:
> 1) Subchannels for a channel are distributed evenly across all vcpus we have.
>    Currently we try to distribute all channels (including subchannels) across
>    all vcpus, this approach doesn't guarantee that the particular channel's
>    subchannels will be distributed in the same way as we process all offer
>    requests in some random order. (Patch 05)
> 2) Channel picking based on the current vcpu is dropped from
>    vmbus_get_outgoing_channel() in favor of a fair round robin. (Patch 06)
> (this
>    is not true anymore, see 'Changes').
> 
> Patches 01 - 04 are cleanup/refactoring.
> 
> Vitaly Kuznetsov (6):
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: unify calls to percpu_channel_enq()
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: briefly comment num_sc and next_oc
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: decrease num_sc on subchannel removal
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: move init_vp_index() call to vmbus_process_offer()
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: distribute subchannels among all vcpus
>   Drivers: hv: vmbus: improve selection of an outgoing channel
> 
>  drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> -----------
>  include/linux/hyperv.h    |  12 +++--
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> --

Patch 1, 2 and 3 are good to me.

We'll have to test 4~6 for performance change.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-27 17:04 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: unify calls to percpu_channel_enq() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: briefly comment num_sc and next_oc Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: decrease num_sc on subchannel removal Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: move init_vp_index() call to vmbus_process_offer() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: distribute subchannels among all vcpus Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: improve selection of an outgoing channel Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-04-28  4:30 ` Dexuan Cui [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d503b43941504d17a33d307426e739db@SIXPR30MB031.064d.mgd.msft.net \
    --to=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®