Re: [PATCH 1/8] samples: move accounting example code from Documentation

[Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>]

On 09/19/2016 10:02 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:47:32 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> 
>> Move accounting examples to samples and remove it from Documentation
>> Makefile. Create a new Makefile to build accounting. It can be built
>> from top level directory or from accounting directory:
> 
> So I like the basic idea of these patches; it's the direction we've been
> trying to push things for a little bit.  I have a couple of specific
> comments for this one that may well apply to the others as well.
> 
> 1) Is samples the right destination for these utilities?  Some of them
>    might well be better placed under tools/ instead.  I'm not sure we've
>    ever formally stated the purpose of those two subtrees; I see samples/
>    as demonstrations of how to use something, while tools/ are utilities
>    you might actually want to use for some purpose.  Something like
>    getdelays might well fall into the latter group.  But maybe others
>    disagree?

getdelays stumped me a bit. My first choice was tools and then I noticed
that the documentation says it is a tool and an example usage of taskstruct.
I am not set on tools or samples as location for this. I can move it to
tools instead.

> 
> 2) Tools like getdelays are referenced in the documents that have been
>    left behind; see accounting/delay-accounting.txt, for example.  Those
>    documents should be updated so that readers know where to find the
>    referenced programs, wherever they end up.  Converting them to Sphinx
>    while you're at it is an extra-credit exercise :)

Right. Documents need updates and also the 00-Index files. I agree with
you that converting to Sphinx makes sense. There will be some learning
curve on my part. I can take this one once the move happens and do the
Documentation and 00-Index file updates.

thanks,
-- Shuah