From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C42352017 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791878172; cv=none; b=WP0XPgVLk75A8oxRYEgRa5MSr2ibac9ugBSykNjbSTKaIwsbqWzW8hkZRkbf+IESO+YpunRba8R1btJ9jrQp3rHxpM5l7NxTd4xEHtvIiGBz9ekqS8MPEuEI4c4JZs0CFudGdqrLJqW/JXAHLchRPj8w1cUf7o/6E7pFhkQ6T8U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791878172; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0GWeFJb/qiTJI+X0vmX2m+bo5SlNjkXaEACmBJZEZnU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=urH8wtkBRFv2HmdVOwWsB3EwARqVKXfrpm2idQkI5wtR4fnYZf4OLIyPG/WZN1Nl2F4WIANnCMhE71KftUH0TXO1dyyTM4UMc5Zv+aaZkIxdM/lN9Ce6mvF6De6rxmCJ3WFTSOJThZ1KTI0+g54XmkGMTBioDcggbZav/fbdSiU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=GxBJDKH2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="GxBJDKH2" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1791878161; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=emqpj+xGrdk/1pyDpuwsFKgkPlVWJSnSuEc15c8FnIc=; b=GxBJDKH2RFzX4Rdi5nzc3Q7Uf9Ab+2l5IBeQO8iGI5seMS8Bnkuy4LNPt0EMOB/lv2cLdUoY9sltfeIK5gZWD9T4M04f9xW6shibs6fpH9O0a0duXZMG5AgVTWJibtDVeadEJqCex5jVfOUAEM0D2hyEodowtKuYAipDJlY8pr8= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R161e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam011083073210;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=10;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0XCl0LN2_1791878160; Received: from 30.221.145.80(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0XCl0LN2_1791878160 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:56:01 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:56:00 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: hold a lock reference across grant AST enqueue To: Cen Zhang Cc: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, heming.zhao@suse.com, kees@kernel.org, sunil.mushran@oracle.com, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com, jjzuming@gmail.com References: From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/12/26 9:30 AM, Cen Zhang wrote: > A newly granted remote lock must remain alive until its grant AST is > queued. dlmlock_master() publishes the lock on res->granted with its > base and queue references, then drops res->spinlock before calling > dlm_queue_ast(). The resource's reserved AST count does not retain the > lock itself. > > This can fail when a peer dies with an immediately grantable CREATE > buffered on its socket. O2NET's node-down callback flushes receive work > before DLM cleanup, but the flush only waits for work queued on entry. > A data-ready callback that already selected the socket container can > queue new receive work after the flush advances its work color. Socket > shutdown does not discard bytes already queued for TCP receive. > > The following ordering leaves the CREATE handler using a freed lock: > > 1. o2net_data_ready() selects the socket container while holding the > socket callback read lock. > 2. o2net_disconnect_node() queues shutdown and starts its flush. The > callback queues sc_rx_work after the color change, then unlocks, > allowing shutdown to unregister callbacks and shut down the socket. > 3. The flush completes without waiting for the new receive work. That > work consumes the buffered CREATE and dlmlock_master() grants the > lock before DLM cleanup reaches the resource, then drops > res->spinlock. > 4. dlm_hb_node_down_cb() reaches dlm_free_dead_locks(), which takes > res->spinlock, unlinks the lock and drops both references to free it. > 5. The CREATE handler calls dlm_queue_ast(). __dlm_queue_ast() reads > lock->lockres before acquiring its AST-list reference, causing UAF. > It is better to illustrate the race case with a sequence diagram. Also please change the patch title to "ocfs2/dlm: xxx". > Take a temporary lock reference under res->spinlock when a grant AST > will be queued, and drop it after dlm_queue_ast(). This keeps the lock > alive across cleanup until the AST path has taken its own reference, > without reversing the existing AST/resource lock order. > > KASAN report as below: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00 > Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810ead5940 by task kworker/u16:3/52 > > CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc4-next-20260921-pmb-bt-functional-v1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy) > Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 > Workqueue: o2net o2net_rx_until_empty > Call Trace: > > dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 > print_report+0xce/0x630 > ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __virt_addr_valid+0x20e/0x420 > ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00 > kasan_report+0xe0/0x110 > ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00 > __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x130/0x270 > ? __pfx___dlm_queue_ast+0x10/0x10 > ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 > ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x60 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xeb/0x1a0 > dlm_queue_ast+0x46/0x70 > dlmlock_master+0x51f/0xf50 > ? __pfx_dlmlock_master+0x10/0x10 > ? dlm_create_lock_handler+0x2b2/0x870 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290 > dlm_create_lock_handler+0x35b/0x870 > ? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x160 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x31/0x60 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10 > o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0 > ? reacquire_held_locks+0xdd/0x200 > ? __pfx_o2net_rx_until_empty+0x10/0x10 > ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300 > ? process_one_work+0x935/0x1b40 > ? process_one_work+0x834/0x1b40 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40 > ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 > ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300 > ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __kthread_parkme+0x177/0x220 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 > kthread+0x351/0x460 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940 > ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10 > ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 > ? __switch_to+0x74f/0xf70 > ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > > > Allocated by task 52: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 > __kasan_slab_alloc+0x89/0x90 > kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x20b/0x5c0 > dlm_new_lock+0x39/0x5f0 > dlm_create_lock_handler+0x16e/0x870 > o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0 > process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40 > worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40 > kthread+0x351/0x460 > ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940 > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > > Freed by task 603: > kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 > kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 > kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 > __kasan_slab_free+0x5f/0x80 > kmem_cache_free+0x242/0x580 > dlm_lock_release+0x1df/0x2f0 > dlm_lock_put+0x51/0x80 > __dlm_hb_node_down+0x15be/0x2710 > dlm_hb_node_down_cb+0x6c/0xa0 > o2hb_run_event_list+0x34a/0x500 > o2hb_do_disk_heartbeat+0x1a07/0x2950 > o2hb_thread+0x1ed/0xdc0 > kthread+0x351/0x460 > ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940 > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810ead5900 > which belongs to the cache o2dlm_lock of size 184 > The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of > freed 184-byte region [ffff88810ead5900, ffff88810ead59b8) > > [Page and shadow memory dumps omitted.] > > Fixes: 2c5c54aca9d0 ("ocfs2/dlm: Add missing dlm_lock_put()s") > Assisted-by: LLM Cc: is missing here. Thanks, Joseph > Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang > --- > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c > index 46120eb75d90..660237c0d7cd 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c > @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > res->lockname.len)) { > kick_thread = 1; > call_ast = 1; > + /* Keep the lock alive through AST enqueue. */ > + dlm_lock_get(lock); > } else { > mlog(0, "%s: returning DLM_NORMAL to " > "node %u for reco lock\n", dlm->name, > @@ -166,10 +168,12 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > wake_up(&res->wq); > > /* either queue the ast or release it */ > - if (call_ast) > + if (call_ast) { > dlm_queue_ast(dlm, lock); > - else > + dlm_lock_put(lock); > + } else { > dlm_lockres_release_ast(dlm, res); > + } > > dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res); > if (kick_thread)