From: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove redundant variable declaration in __dev_change_flags()
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:27:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d556d7be-e3c5-45c7-930b-386576f0e2d1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214-old_flags-v1-1-29096b9399a9@debian.org>
On 2/14/2025 1:47 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> The old_flags variable is declared twice in __dev_change_flags(),
> causing a shadow variable warning. This patch fixes the issue by
> removing the redundant declaration, reusing the existing old_flags
> variable instead.
>
> net/core/dev.c:9225:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
> 9225 | unsigned int old_flags = dev->flags;
> | ^
> net/core/dev.c:9185:15: note: previous declaration is here
> 9185 | unsigned int old_flags = dev->flags;
> | ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> This change has no functional impact on the code, as the inner variable
> does not affect the outer one. The fix simply eliminates the unnecessary
> declaration and resolves the warning.
>
> Fixes: 991fb3f74c142e ("dev: always advertise rx_flags changes via netlink")
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d5ab9a4b318ea4926c200ef20dae01eaafa18c6b..cd2474a138201e6ee86acf39ca425d57d8d2e9b4 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -9182,7 +9182,7 @@ int __dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int flags,
>
> if ((flags ^ dev->gflags) & IFF_PROMISC) {
> int inc = (flags & IFF_PROMISC) ? 1 : -1;
> - unsigned int old_flags = dev->flags;
> + old_flags = dev->flags;
>
> dev->gflags ^= IFF_PROMISC;
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 7a7e0197133d18cfd9931e7d3a842d0f5730223f
> change-id: 20250214-old_flags-528fe052471c
>
> Best regards,
Good change but it has to be tagged to net and not net-next. Please
resend but add also my RB tag, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 12:47 Breno Leitao
2025-02-14 13:27 ` Mateusz Polchlopek [this message]
2025-02-14 13:33 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-14 14:21 ` Breno Leitao
2025-02-14 15:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-14 16:09 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d556d7be-e3c5-45c7-930b-386576f0e2d1@intel.com \
--to=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®