mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parav@nvidia.com, elic@nvidia.com,
	"Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vdpa: mandate 1.0 device
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:41:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5632a4d-4d0b-b08d-06f9-c56f16734607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01918e14-7f7a-abf2-5864-292a32f0233c@redhat.com>


在 2021/4/12 下午5:23, Jason Wang 写道:
>
> 在 2021/4/12 下午5:09, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:35:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> 在 2021/4/10 上午12:04, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:47:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> 在 2021/4/8 下午11:59, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:26:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> This patch mandates 1.0 for vDPA devices. The goal is to have the
>>>>>>> semantic of normative statement in the virtio spec and eliminate 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> burden of transitional device for both vDPA bus and vDPA parent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> uAPI seems fine since all the vDPA parent mandates
>>>>>>> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM which implies 1.0 devices.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For legacy guests, it can still work since Qemu will mediate when
>>>>>>> necessary (e.g doing the endian conversion).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>>>>> Hmm. If we do this, don't we still have a problem with
>>>>>> legacy drivers which don't ack 1.0?
>>>>> Yes, but it's not something that is introduced in this commit. The 
>>>>> legacy
>>>>> driver never work ...
>>>> My point is this neither fixes or prevents this.
>>>>
>>>> So my suggestion is to finally add ioctls along the lines
>>>> of PROTOCOL_FEATURES of vhost-user.
>>>>
>>>> Then that one can have bits for legacy le, legacy be and modern.
>>>>
>>>> BTW I looked at vhost-user and it does not look like that
>>>> has a solution for this problem either, right?
>>>
>>> Right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Note 1.0 affects ring endianness which is not mediated in QEMU
>>>>>> so QEMU can't pretend to device guest is 1.0.
>>>>> Right, I plan to send patches to do mediation in the Qemu to 
>>>>> unbreak legacy
>>>>> drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>> I frankly think we'll need PROTOCOL_FEATURES anyway, it's too 
>>>> useful ...
>>>> so why not teach drivers about it and be done with it? You can't 
>>>> emulate
>>>> legacy on modern in a cross endian situation because of vring
>>>> endian-ness ...
>>>
>>> So the problem still. This can only work when the hardware can support
>>> legacy vring endian-ness.
>>>
>>> Consider:
>>>
>>> 1) the leagcy driver support is non-normative in the spec
>>> 2) support a transitional device in the kenrel may requires the 
>>> hardware
>>> support and a burden of kernel codes
>>>
>>> I'd rather simply drop the legacy driver support
>>
>> My point is this patch does not drop legacy support. It merely mandates
>> modern support.
>
>
> I am not sure I get here. This patch fails the set_feature if 
> VERSION_1 is not negotiated. This means:
>
> 1) vDPA presents a modern device instead of transitonal device
> 2) legacy driver can't be probed
>
> What I'm missing?


Hi Michael:

Do you agree to find the way to present modern device? We need a 
conclusion to make the netlink API work to move forward.

Thanks


>
>
>>
>>> to have a simple and easy
>>> abstarction in the kenrel. For legacy driver in the guest, 
>>> hypervisor is in
>>> charge of the mediation:
>>>
>>> 1) config space access endian conversion
>>> 2) using shadow virtqueue to change the endian in the vring
>>>
>>> Thanks
>> I'd like to avoid shadow virtqueue hacks if at all possible.
>> Last I checked performance wasn't much better than just emulating
>> virtio in software.
>
>
> I think the legacy driver support is just a nice to have. Or do you 
> see any value to that? I guess for mellanox and intel, only modern 
> device is supported in the hardware.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     include/linux/vdpa.h | 6 ++++++
>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>>> index 0fefeb976877..cfde4ec999b4 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>>>>>     #include <linux/device.h>
>>>>>>>     #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>>>>>     #include <linux/vhost_iotlb.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
>>>>>>>     /**
>>>>>>>      * vDPA callback definition.
>>>>>>> @@ -317,6 +318,11 @@ static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct 
>>>>>>> vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>             const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
>>>>>>> +        /* Mandating 1.0 to have semantics of normative 
>>>>>>> statements in
>>>>>>> +         * the spec. */
>>>>>>> +        if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)))
>>>>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>         vdev->features_valid = true;
>>>>>>>             return ops->set_features(vdev, features);
>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> 2.25.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08  8:26 Jason Wang
2021-04-08 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-09  4:47   ` Jason Wang
2021-04-09 16:04     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-12  6:35       ` Jason Wang
2021-04-12  9:09         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-12  9:23           ` Jason Wang
2021-04-21  7:41             ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-04-21  8:03               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-21  8:17                 ` Jason Wang
2021-05-11  8:43                   ` Jason Wang
2021-05-12  7:53                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-12  9:24                       ` Jason Wang
2021-06-02 10:30                         ` Eli Cohen
2021-06-03  7:14                           ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5632a4d-4d0b-b08d-06f9-c56f16734607@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®