From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA3301109; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 07:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722841281; cv=none; b=KBez5ehVOQxq0HVbPZ7hUdvAzR5xE9OBInX03Rr7G/RfobHMpXz7GGT0mVNFDAzBI5hHprjWpjBM/Ii0Qj783CjdCxek+pYEQgqOMlJk+Pzq+pkg5fwjpVoN5rwIwfOeLAMxXR3ekw3IICLDsoZ1L8YNNOeT7zh0i4YHMl+NRhc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722841281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lLpNY2gvKncPHrzY9sUabSQ0nRzvIjqpZU+/Z1TWLL8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:CC:References:Subject:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=vA9R5XLwTm/iGwHtdVTl3XPS3ArXn9qmUihW9wyWxP968Y9NQviSf7UNFFJQLYs4OBFyJ39J6wUDVAC7dtpmmaxQpickp5/FuUTKCIHs744MoEHQzn11IxaRt84Ntfs8jvLqi3z2cMeN2NlrBC26RJmjKlcPiG1rUUdQz55Cm3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WcnPh1dVYznVZy; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:00:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.84]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0862C180100; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:01:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.13] (10.174.179.13) by dggpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:01:14 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:01:10 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 To: CC: , , References: <2024073038-CVE-2024-42226-fa39@gregkh> Subject: Re: CVE-2024-42226: usb: xhci: prevent potential failure in handle_tx_event() for Transfer events without TRB From: Jinjiang Tu In-Reply-To: <2024073038-CVE-2024-42226-fa39@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.84) Hi， I noticed the fix commit is reverted in 6.1.99 and 6.6.39 due to performance regression. Does it means this CVE should be rejected？ Thanks！