From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127BAC001DE for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 02:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230406AbjHACmX (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2023 22:42:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37850 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229481AbjHACmV (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2023 22:42:21 -0400 Received: from out30-97.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-97.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.97]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E761723 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 19:42:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R631e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045176;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VojMtct_1690857735; Received: from 30.97.48.66(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VojMtct_1690857735) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 10:42:17 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:42:44 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/compaction: remove stale fast_find_block flag in isolate_migratepages To: Kemeng Shi , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com References: <20230728171037.2219226-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> <20230728171037.2219226-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: <20230728171037.2219226-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote: > In old code, we set skip to found page block in fast_find_migrateblock. So > we use fast_find_block to avoid skip found page block from > fast_find_migrateblock. > In 90ed667c03fe5 ("Revert "Revert "mm/compaction: fix set skip in > fast_find_migrateblock"""), we remove skip set in fast_find_migrateblock, > then fast_find_block is useless. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi > --- > mm/compaction.c | 12 +----------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c > index ad535f880c70..09c36251c613 100644 > --- a/mm/compaction.c > +++ b/mm/compaction.c > @@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc) > const isolate_mode_t isolate_mode = > (sysctl_compact_unevictable_allowed ? ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE : 0) | > (cc->mode != MIGRATE_SYNC ? ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE : 0); > - bool fast_find_block; > > /* > * Start at where we last stopped, or beginning of the zone as > @@ -1961,13 +1960,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc) > if (block_start_pfn < cc->zone->zone_start_pfn) > block_start_pfn = cc->zone->zone_start_pfn; > > - /* > - * fast_find_migrateblock marks a pageblock skipped so to avoid > - * the isolation_suitable check below, check whether the fast > - * search was successful. > - */ > - fast_find_block = low_pfn != cc->migrate_pfn && !cc->fast_search_fail; > - > /* Only scan within a pageblock boundary */ > block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(low_pfn); > > @@ -1976,7 +1968,6 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc) > * Do not cross the free scanner. > */ > for (; block_end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn; > - fast_find_block = false, > cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn = block_end_pfn, > block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn, > block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) { > @@ -2007,8 +1998,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct compact_control *cc) > * before making it "skip" so other compaction instances do > * not scan the same block. > */ > - if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && > - !fast_find_block && !isolation_suitable(cc, page)) > + if (pageblock_aligned(low_pfn) && !isolation_suitable(cc, page)) I do not think so. If the pageblock is found by fast_find_migrateblock(), that means it definitely has not been set the skip flag, so there is not need to call isolation_suitable() if fast_find_block is true, right?