From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
scclevenger@os.amperecomputing.com, acme@redhat.com,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darren@os.amperecomputing.com,
james.clark@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Al.Grant@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf scripts python arm-cs-trace-disasm.py: Skip disasm if address continuity is broken
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:42:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d58dfe42-5888-445d-979f-44bd59148079@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa159649-4274-4bc4-94fe-f9d112b198df@linaro.org>
On 30-08-2024 03:28 pm, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 23/08/2024 10:57 am, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> Hi James/Mike,
>>
>> On 23-08-2024 02:33 pm, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19/08/2024 11:59 am, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> A new branch of OpenCSD is available -
>>>> ocsd-consistency-checks-1.5.4-rc1
>>>>
>>>> Testing I managed to do confirms the N atom on unconditional branches
>>>> appear to work. I do not have a test case for the range
>>>> discontinuities.
>>>>
>>>> The checks are enabled using operation flags on decoder creation. See
>>>> the docs for details.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I tested the new OpenCSD and I don't see the error anymore in the
>>> disassembly script. I'm not sure if we need to go any further and add
>>> the backwards check, it looks like just a later symptom and the checks
>>> that you've added already prevent it.
>>>
>>> If you release a new version I can send the perf patch. I was going to
>>> use these flags if that looks right to you? As far as I know that's the
>>> set that can be always on and won't fail on bad hardware?
>>>
>>> I also assumed that ETM4_OPFLG_PKTDEC_AA64_OPCODE_CHK can be given even
>>> for etmv3 and it's just a nop?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
>>> b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
>>> index e917985bbbe6..90967fd807e6 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
>>> @@ -685,9 +685,14 @@ cs_etm_decoder__create_etm_decoder(struct
>>> cs_etm_decoder_params *d_params,
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> if (d_params->operation == CS_ETM_OPERATION_DECODE) {
>>> + int decode_flags = OCSD_CREATE_FLG_FULL_DECODER;
>>> +#ifdef OCSD_OPFLG_N_UNCOND_DIR_BR_CHK
>>> + decode_flags |= OCSD_OPFLG_N_UNCOND_DIR_BR_CHK |
>>> OCSD_OPFLG_CHK_RANGE_CONTINUE |
>>> + ETM4_OPFLG_PKTDEC_AA64_OPCODE_CHK;
>>> +#endif
>>> if (ocsd_dt_create_decoder(decoder->dcd_tree,
>>> decoder->decoder_name,
>>> - OCSD_CREATE_FLG_FULL_DECODER,
>>> + decode_flags,
>>> trace_config, &csid))
>>> return -1;
>>>
>>
>> I tried Mike's branch with above James's patch and still the segfault
>> is happening to us.
>>
>
> Looks like the Perf bug is only on the timestamped decode path, you can
> force timeless as a workaround. Timestamps aren't used by the
> disassembly script anyway:
>
> --itrace=Zb
>
> Full command:
>
> perf script -i ./kcore -s python:tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-\
> trace-disasm.py --itrace=Zb -- -k ./kcore/kcore_dir/kcore
>
Thanks James, I could run without any issue with "--itrace=Zb"
> You can also disable timestamps when recording then you don't need the
> itrace option. This will save you a lot of data anyway.
>
> But I'm still working on the proper fix.
Thanks.
--
Thanks,
Ganapat/GK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 9:26 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-19 14:39 ` James Clark
2024-07-22 10:02 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-23 13:10 ` James Clark
2024-07-23 15:26 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-23 15:46 ` James Clark
2024-07-24 6:38 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-24 14:45 ` James Clark
2024-08-01 10:00 ` James Clark
2024-08-01 10:28 ` Al Grant
2024-08-01 11:26 ` James Clark
2024-08-01 11:58 ` Al Grant
2024-08-01 14:58 ` James Clark
2024-08-05 12:22 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-05 13:59 ` James Clark
2024-08-06 7:02 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-06 9:47 ` James Clark
2024-08-06 9:57 ` James Clark
2024-08-06 15:02 ` Steve Clevenger
2024-08-06 16:14 ` James Clark
2024-08-07 12:17 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-07 14:53 ` James Clark
2024-08-07 16:18 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-07 19:20 ` Leo Yan
2024-08-08 4:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-08 7:42 ` Leo Yan
2024-08-08 9:21 ` James Clark
2024-08-08 10:51 ` James Clark
2024-08-08 11:14 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-08 15:01 ` Mike Leach
2024-08-07 16:48 ` Leo Yan
2024-08-08 9:32 ` James Clark
2024-08-08 11:05 ` Leo Yan
2024-08-09 14:13 ` Mike Leach
2024-08-09 15:19 ` James Clark
2024-08-19 10:59 ` Mike Leach
2024-08-23 9:03 ` James Clark
2024-08-23 9:57 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-23 10:36 ` James Clark
2024-08-23 10:37 ` James Clark
2024-08-30 9:58 ` James Clark
2024-09-02 6:12 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni [this message]
2024-08-28 9:33 ` Mike Leach
2024-08-29 13:35 ` James Clark
2024-08-08 7:54 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d58dfe42-5888-445d-979f-44bd59148079@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=scclevenger@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®