From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, seanjc@google.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, nik.borisov@suse.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bhi: BHI mitigation can trigger warning in #DB handler
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:34:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d592b997-54f6-4119-bcf1-ff180713d6be@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c69f62e-0dee-4caa-9cbe-f43d8efd597b@oracle.com>
On 23/05/2024 3:52 pm, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>
> On 5/23/24 16:28, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 5/23/24 05:33, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>>> The problem can be reproduced with the following sequence:
>>>
>>> $ cat sysenter_step.c
>>> int main()
>>> { asm("pushf; pop %ax; bts $8,%ax; push %ax; popf; sysenter"); }
>>>
>>> $ gcc -o sysenter_step sysenter_step.c
>>>
>>> $ ./sysenter_step
>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>>
>>> The program is expected to crash, and the #DB handler will issue a
>>> warning.
>>
>> Should we wrap up this gem and put it with the other entry selftests?
>
> It looks like tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c tests
> sysenter with TF set but it doesn't check if the kernel issues any
> warning.
But shouldn't the SIGSEGV still cause the selftest to notice?
Also, there should be a selftest for NT. (mis)handling of that will
take the entire kernel down.
AC for good measure too, as that's the other flag handled specially.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 12:33 Alexandre Chartre
2024-05-23 12:36 ` Greg KH
2024-05-23 12:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-05-23 12:59 ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-05-23 14:59 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-05-23 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-23 14:52 ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-05-23 15:34 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2024-05-23 15:36 ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-23 17:03 ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-05-23 17:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-05-23 18:27 ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-05-23 18:30 ` Alexandre Chartre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d592b997-54f6-4119-bcf1-ff180713d6be@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®