From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C80C433EF for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 12:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239220AbiEUMVf (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 08:21:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38048 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232622AbiEUMVc (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 08:21:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FB2A1FCE3 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 05:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id x143so9785591pfc.11 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 05:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfHmtlCQtYvyaOp3BTWx/NwfcevCZ/dQvENt+OCB6OU=; b=i1Z7sKvKg/r7Fu90Re3JGKGo4OH8g8Rh6cF/OLtxysHA/ntRqQvqKVSVq2oF1hT6L4 cNnY4wBcAg9kqs771D/Xc0PAxFm6ZZUDIHEvQjJlLqiY3ZTF1MkvntDJylyJoP3yjEBy aEgkl0OIh0MepffoSk4c1rEgxTlrxXHO0w8y7AoWrX0RPPOstSM83S7ponJCoxe2/3Fk cwTavtZmoY0/bOt2sJHHNhlb66apetZalZEVahMDSTFRMRHJpK3IFC3Iowh6/6VEjb2O U9kKXX8EL0eVtbcvNrYJg2Z3WKlp5dK6tZVXG5aOLhqu829Yw3YQXHKun68AuCwVTcgC vCTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfHmtlCQtYvyaOp3BTWx/NwfcevCZ/dQvENt+OCB6OU=; b=3qG63tTZZNM78iKfITysrLkTAGluig4OEJiitI9MzsLCgkEW8p5zsGEO9A61aKYXaN KpYvdGfvunPz9TPOS6UKQxUjs/Js8WAIbuLT5FHLEr6TB0tCs4bVS+JcV32D6r/vlQZc RVXuLQJOaql4LrpT22MEWXI8u339PDw2cjRhS62ZGLvD0p3G/ToOPJJG7tKe6hAxMy+B rtLNT3DiDLnRPDOCMlsygeJLkrOBR94P4XQSNoC7NIiBsaq3DiZuoI82ATcfcV7IajIp 5YnYqowXmdf/2MTgtet8SRtyHrF5EF4aOYwEG98WbTBrguI6jIxzgrP9gr1dFtonO5wn zxcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314ZKlXFMeRjkcTRgd71dPGfe0lIlWLPXvUrPJGBsihNll5lBfJ dP2KCXWXZy9Nb6ODQMCGFM5bBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+5j9W+uGqvyx64pvj2Pi9VtZZrzR4LWDDdBMSzozlbeja1Pr6gXBE/S71yWDyxP7HGY8Qjg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:3c05:0:b0:3f2:6ea8:aff2 with SMTP id j5-20020a633c05000000b003f26ea8aff2mr12765049pga.340.1653135689908; Sat, 21 May 2022 05:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t71-20020a63784a000000b003db610ebdd0sm1403982pgc.65.2022.05.21.05.21.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 May 2022 05:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 06:21:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion Content-Language: en-US To: "yukuai (C)" , paolo.valente@linaro.org Cc: jack@suse.cz, tj@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com References: <20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <61b67d5e-829c-8130-7bda-81615d654829@huawei.com> <81411289-e13c-20f5-df63-c059babca57a@huawei.com> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <81411289-e13c-20f5-df63-c059babca57a@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/21/22 1:22 AM, yukuai (C) wrote: > 在 2022/05/14 17:29, yukuai (C) 写道: >> 在 2022/05/05 9:00, yukuai (C) 写道: >>> Hi, Paolo >>> >>> Can you take a look at this patchset? It has been quite a long time >>> since we spotted this problem... >>> >> >> friendly ping ... > friendly ping ... I can't speak for Paolo, but I've mentioned before that the majority of your messages end up in my spam. That's still the case, in fact I just marked maybe 10 of them as not spam. You really need to get this issued sorted out, or you will continue to have patches ignore because folks may simply not see them. -- Jens Axboe