From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753575AbdBRR5o (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:57:44 -0500 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:40782 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753093AbdBRR5m (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:57:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/20] Replace PCI pool by DMA pool API To: Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20170218083556.20215-1-romain.perier@collabora.com> <20170218130600.GA24938@kroah.com> Cc: Dan Williams , Doug Ledford , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, "David S. Miller" , stas.yakovlev@gmail.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Felipe Balbi , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Senna Tschudin From: Romain Perier Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:57:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170218130600.GA24938@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 18/02/2017 à 14:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: >> The current PCI pool API are simple macro functions direct expanded to >> the appropriated dma pool functions. The prototypes are almost the same >> and semantically, they are very similar. I propose to use the DMA pool >> API directly and get rid of the old API. >> >> This set of patches, replaces the old API by the dma pool API, adds >> support to warn about this old API in checkpath.pl and remove the >> defines. > Why is this a "RFC" series? Personally, I never apply those as it > implies that the author doesn't think they are ready to be merged :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi, I was not sure about this. I have noticed that most of the API changes are tagged as RFC. I can re-send a v3 without the prefix RFC if you prefer. Thanks, Romain