mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM: EM: Fix incorrect description of the cost field in struct em_perf_state
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:35:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5ee5e5b-d636-47c7-83e6-b58cab9f4d6e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251230061534.816894-1-tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>



On 12/30/25 06:15, Yaxiong Tian wrote:
> Due to commit 1b600da51073 ("PM: EM: Optimize em_cpu_energy() and remove
> division"), the logic for energy consumption calculation has been modified.
> The actual calculation of cost is 10 * power * max_frequency / frequency
> instead of power * max_frequency / frequency.
> 
> Therefore, the comment for cost has been updated to reflect the correct
> content.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian <tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   include/linux/energy_model.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> index 43aa6153dc57..e7497f804644 100644
> --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>    * @power:	The power consumed at this level (by 1 CPU or by a registered
>    *		device). It can be a total power: static and dynamic.
>    * @cost:	The cost coefficient associated with this level, used during
> - *		energy calculation. Equal to: power * max_frequency / frequency
> + *		energy calculation. Equal to: 10 * power * max_frequency / frequency
>    * @flags:	see "em_perf_state flags" description below.
>    */
>   struct em_perf_state {

Good catch, thank you!

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-30  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-30  6:15 Yaxiong Tian
2025-12-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM: EM: Simplify mutex-related code in energy_model.c using scoped_guard Yaxiong Tian
2025-12-30  9:35 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2026-01-08 15:53   ` [PATCH 1/2] PM: EM: Fix incorrect description of the cost field in struct em_perf_state Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5ee5e5b-d636-47c7-83e6-b58cab9f4d6e@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tianyaxiong@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®