From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: fix mount options not being applied
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:03:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6588ae2-0fdb-480d-8448-9c993fdc2563@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1b3f555-acfe-4fd1-8aa4-b97f456fd6f4@redhat.com>
On 8/4/25 12:22 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/4/25 9:30 AM, Charalampos Mitrodimas wrote:
>> Mount options (uid, gid, mode) are silently ignored when debugfs is
>> mounted. This is a regression introduced during the conversion to the
>> new mount API.
>>
>> When the mount API conversion was done, the line that sets
>> sb->s_fs_info to the parsed options was removed. This causes
>> debugfs_apply_options() to operate on a NULL pointer.
>>
>> As an example, with the bug the "mode" mount option is ignored:
>>
>> $ mount -o mode=0666 -t debugfs debugfs /tmp/debugfs_test
>> $ mount | grep debugfs_test
>> debugfs on /tmp/debugfs_test type debugfs (rw,relatime)
>> $ ls -ld /tmp/debugfs_test
>> drwx------ 25 root root 0 Aug 4 14:16 /tmp/debugfs_test
>
> Argh. So, this looks a lot like the issue that got fixed for tracefs in:
>
> e4d32142d1de tracing: Fix tracefs mount options
>
> Let me look at this; tracefs & debugfs are quite similar, so perhaps
> keeping the fix consistent would make sense as well but I'll dig
> into it a bit more.
So, yes - a fix following the pattern of e4d32142d1de does seem to resolve
this issue.
However, I think we might be playing whack-a-mole here (fixing one fs at a time,
when the problem is systemic) among filesystems that use get_tree_single()
and have configurable options. For example, pstore:
# umount /sys/fs/pstore
# mount -t pstore -o kmsg_bytes=65536 none /sys/fs/pstore
# mount | grep pstore
none on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,relatime,seclabel)
# mount -o remount,kmsg_bytes=65536 /sys/fs/pstore
# mount | grep pstore
none on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw,relatime,seclabel,kmsg_bytes=65536)
#
I think gadgetfs most likely has the same problem but I'm not yet sure
how to test that.
I have no real objection to merging your patch, though I like the
consistency of following e4d32142d1de a bit more. But I think we should
find a graceful solution so that any filesystem using get_tree_single
can avoid this pitfall, if possible.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-04 14:30 Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-08-04 16:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-04 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-08-05 17:03 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2025-08-05 17:22 ` Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-08-06 16:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-08-08 14:13 ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-13 22:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-08-13 23:49 ` Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-08-14 9:05 ` Aleksa Sarai
2025-08-14 13:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2025-08-14 16:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-08-15 0:31 ` Aleksa Sarai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6588ae2-0fdb-480d-8448-9c993fdc2563@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=charmitro@posteo.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®