From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>, "Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:29:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6647f5eb213d2ece82753285a79f28f600420d7.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+HfNhn9eK+3xsd3ewEsG-duCgBeYXeLAtNan=qefas2Ya0dQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2026-06-29 at 16:21 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
Hi Björn,
I'm working through bpf patches queue and have a question regarding
this series. What's your stance, does it need changes or can I apply
it to bpf-next?
Thanks,
Eduard
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 14:00 Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] bpf: Extract the is_struct_ops_tramp helper Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] riscv, bpf: Remove redundant ctx->offset initialization Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] riscv, bpf: Using kvzalloc_objs to allocate cache buffer Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] riscv, bpf: Add RV_TAILCALL_OFFSET macro to format tailcall offset Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] riscv, bpf: Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Remove tailcalls tests from DENYLIST.riscv64 Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 16:19 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 7:23 ` Pu Lehui
2026-06-29 14:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64 Björn Töpel
2026-07-06 7:08 ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-06 19:29 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-07-07 1:31 ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-07 6:08 ` Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6647f5eb213d2ece82753285a79f28f600420d7.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®