From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Yuvaraj Ranganathan <quic_yrangana@quicinc.com>,
Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: dma: qcom: bam-dma: Add missing required properties
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d674d626-e6a3-4683-8f45-81b09200849f@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6231bBqNhA2M4Ap@linaro.org>
On 13.02.2025 10:13 AM, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:01:59PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 12.02.2025 6:03 PM, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>>> num-channels and qcom,num-ees are required when there are no clocks
>>> specified in the device tree, because we have no reliable way to read them
>>> from the hardware registers if we cannot ensure the BAM hardware is up when
>>> the device is being probed.
>>>
>>> This has often been forgotten when adding new SoC device trees, so make
>>> this clear by describing this requirement in the schema.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> index 3ad0d9b1fbc5e4f83dd316d1ad79773c288748ba..5f7e7763615578717651014cfd52745ea2132115 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> @@ -90,8 +90,12 @@ required:
>>> anyOf:
>>> - required:
>>> - qcom,powered-remotely
>>> + - num-channels
>>> + - qcom,num-ees
>>> - required:
>>> - qcom,controlled-remotely
>>> + - num-channels
>>> + - qcom,num-ees
>>
>> I think I'd rather see these deprecated and add the clock everywhere..
>> Do we know which one we need to add on newer platforms? Or maybe it's
>> been transformed into an icc path?
>
> This isn't feasible, there are too many different setups. Also often the
> BAM power management is tightly integrated into the consumer interface.
> To give a short excerpt (I'm sure there are even more obscure uses):
>
> - BLSP BAM (UART, I2C, SPI on older SoCs):
> 1. Enable GCC_BLSP_AHB_CLK
> -> This is what the bam_dma driver supports currently.
>
> - Crypto BAM: Either
> OR 1. Vote for single RPM clock
> OR 1. Enable 3 separate clocks (CE, CE_AHB, CE_AXI)
> OR 1. Vote dummy bandwidth for interconnect
>
> - BAM DMUX (WWAN on older SoCs):
> 1. Start modem firmware
> 2. Wait for BAM DMUX service to be up
> 3. Vote for power up via the BAM-DMUX-specific SMEM state
> 4. Hope the firmware agrees and brings up the BAM
>
> - SLIMbus BAM (audio on some SoCs):
> 1. Start ADSP firmware
> 2. Wait for QMI SLIMBUS service to be up via QRTR
> 3. Vote for power up via SLIMbus-specific QMI messages
> 4. Hope the firmware agrees and brings up the BAM
>
> Especially for the last two, we can't implement support for those
> consumer-specific interfaces in the BAM driver. Implementing support for
> the 3 variants of the Crypto BAM would be possible, but it's honestly
> the least interesting use case of all these. It's not really clear why
> we are bothing with the crypto engine on newer SoCs at all, see e.g. [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250118080604.GA721573@sol.localdomain/
>
>> Reading back things from this piece of HW only to add it to DT to avoid
>> reading it later is a really messy solution.
>
> In retrospect, it could have been cleaner to avoid describing the BAM as
> device node independent of the consumer. We wouldn't have this problem
> if the BAM driver would only probe when the consumer is already ready.
>
> But I think specifying num-channels in the device tree is the cleanest
> way out of this mess. I have a second patch series ready that drops
> qcom,num-ees and validates the num-channels once it's safe reading from
> the BAM registers. That way, you just need one boot test to ensure the
> device tree description is really correct.
Thanks for the detailed explanation!
Do you think it could maybe make sense to expose a clock/power-domain
from the modem/adsp rproc and feed it to the DMUX / SLIM instances when
an appropriate ping arrives? This way we'd also defer probing the drivers
until the device is actually accessible.
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 17:03 [PATCH 0/8] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Reenable crypto & cryptobam Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add missing properties for cryptobam Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Stephan Gerhold
2025-08-11 7:50 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Stephan Gerhold
2025-08-11 7:51 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: " Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: " Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: dma: qcom: bam-dma: Add missing required properties Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 21:01 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-02-13 9:13 ` Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-13 14:00 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-02-13 15:22 ` Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-13 16:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-02-19 22:27 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-20 10:09 ` Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix DT error handling for num-channels/ees Stephan Gerhold
2025-02-12 22:19 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-03-14 20:01 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/8] " Bjorn Andersson
2025-07-28 9:36 ` Vinod Koul
2025-08-05 4:58 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d674d626-e6a3-4683-8f45-81b09200849f@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_anusha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_yrangana@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=stephan.gerhold@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®