From: Senthuran Sivarajah <ssivaraj@stud.fra-uas.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: vaibhav.sr@gmail.com, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: greybus: audio_codec: changed a void function to return 0
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:19:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6841445416a5a4b5e51ba786a607e35@stud.fra-uas.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXrS9xwJf5AcBoFJ@kroah.com>
Hello Greg,
I've run the checkpatch.pl script on audio_code.c:
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file --terse
> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
and got the following warning:
> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c:1032: WARNING: void function
> return statements are not generally useful
As Brian wrote, we can either remove the return or leave it as is, so my
"changes" can be ignored. This is not a coding style issue and I should
have been more clear on the commit message. I apologize for the mistake.
Thank you and @Brian for taking the time to reply.
Kind regards,
Senthu
Am 28.10.2021 18:42, schrieb Greg KH:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 05:38:08PM +0200, Senthu Sivarajah wrote:
>> From: Senthuran Sivarajah <ssivaraj@stud.fra-uas.de>
>>
>> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
> What coding style exactly?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Senthuran Sivarajah <ssivaraj@stud.fra-uas.de>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
>> b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
>> index b589cf6b1d03..9f99862791dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
>> @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ static int gbcodec_probe(struct
>> snd_soc_component *comp)
>> static void gbcodec_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
>> {
>> /* Empty function for now */
>> - return;
>> + return 0;
>
> Did you build this change?
>
> Exactly what tool reported a problem with this code and what was the
> exact error?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 15:38 Senthu Sivarajah
2021-10-28 16:35 ` Bryan Brattlof
2021-10-28 16:42 ` Greg KH
2021-10-28 17:19 ` Senthuran Sivarajah [this message]
2021-10-29 2:09 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6841445416a5a4b5e51ba786a607e35@stud.fra-uas.de \
--to=ssivaraj@stud.fra-uas.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vaibhav.sr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®