From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC418C433DB for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2AC23A50 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727760AbhANRAJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:00:09 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:58598 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725854AbhANRAI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:00:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610643522; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JUsobyLQttNjQOv/bXY7/VpogIuR8SlRFnvnIc1/ovQ=; b=b8ZkIMZhbMh4ocPVa7zTnEpkQUUY/t5yqITdSXt6B8Ykf/Kl2gWMlHyzQWCQbl6A0lKrnr y9v7RSyU6/XHYgKX4A3qPYSMGJeUuMY+bltOWghOxWNQuQKeSxdZ0+dG/cyF8XVCwSQjnA Y+gXPgYz2/pTWogTea3JR8DyPEAFjtw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-334-kDmtCxkbOTycjfoyiKu1nw-1; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:58:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: kDmtCxkbOTycjfoyiKu1nw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3FA69CC03; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.165] (ovpn-114-165.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.165]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4845D5D9E2; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: Xieyingtai , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , wangxingang , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "maz@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vivek.gautam@arm.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , qubingbing , "Zengtao (B)" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" References: <20201118112151.25412-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1606829590-25924-1-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com> <2e69adf5-8207-64f7-fa8e-9f2bd3a3c4e3@redhat.com> <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> <0bf50dd6-ef3c-7aba-cbc1-1c2e17088470@redhat.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:58:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0bf50dd6-ef3c-7aba-cbc1-1c2e17088470@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org] >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >>> Cc: Auger Eric ; wangxingang >>> ; Xieyingtai ; >>> kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; will@kernel.org; >>> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >>> vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com; >>> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; >>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) >>> ; qubingbing >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >>> unmanaged ASIDs >>> >>> Hi Shameer, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >>> patches >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >>> Eric's series? >>>> Please share your thoughts. >>> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >>> based on mainline? >> >> Yes. >> >> The uacce-devel branches from >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there. Thanks Eric >> >> Thanks. >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense >> to rebase on top of either of those? >> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. > > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) > > Thanks > > Eric >> >> Thanks, >> Shameer >> >>> Thanks, >>> Jean >> > > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >