From: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Kamal Wadhwa <kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Saikiran <bjsaikiran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:13:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6aa17d9-828b-45ea-b2bf-940f855a00cf@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asZvhvK5kB9DyemI@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
On 10/7/2026 9:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 06:16:29PM +0530, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>
>> Add support for parsing the 'regulator-off-on-delay-us' property from
>> the device tree to enforce this physical constraint.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saikiran <bjsaikiran@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 3 +++
>
> Since this is a generic property I would expect it to be parsed by the
> regulator core, is there some reason for making it driver specific?
No, there is no such reason for now, we'll make this change in the
regulator core as you suggest.
Thanks,
Jishnu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 12:46 [PATCH v4 0/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for off-on-delay and debounce-delay Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add 'regulator-off-on-delay-us' property Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 20:36 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 16:12 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-13 9:43 ` Jishnu Prakash [this message]
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh-regulator: Add debounce delay property Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 20:37 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add debounce delay before disabling regulator Jishnu Prakash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6aa17d9-828b-45ea-b2bf-940f855a00cf@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bjsaikiran@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®